Spyker N.V. « Terug naar discussie overzicht

quote:

AX lover schreef op 2 oktober 2011 22:40:

Muller’s Maalox Moment: China Turns Down Subaru

By Bertel Schmitt on October 2, 2011
What looks like a Chinese-Japanese matter should cause considerable heartburn in Sweden and the Netherlands: The Chinese government has informed Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd. that it will not approve the automaker’s application to set up a joint venture in China, says Japan’s Yomiuri Shimbun. Let’s take a closer look.

Fuji Heavy, manufacturer of Subaru cars, had no manufacture in China. Rather belatedly, it negotiated a joint venture with China’s Chery. These joint ventures require government approval, so in May, the necessary papers were filed with China’s National Development and Reform Commission. The application called for a plant near China’s port city of Dalian. The intended annual capacity of that plant was 150,000 units by 2015. Local and regional authorities usually would fall over themselves to attract such an investment.

China’s central government did not want it. According to the Yomiuri, Fuji Heavy was told the application was denied because Subaru “is an affiliate of Toyota Motor Corp.” Toyota already has two joint ventures in China, and a company can’t have more.

This is widely seen as a face-saving pretext. Toyota has a 16.5 percent stake in Fuji Heavy. If someone would draw a map of cross-holdings in the Japanese auto industry, the Tokyo subway map would look like a Mark Rothko painting in comparison. Says the Yomiuri:

[...]

The complete Chinese car industry is at a crossroads. The explosive growth of China’s car market has made way to single digit growth rates. This is not unusual for China. Instead going through the boom and bust cycles of developed markets, China goes through cycles of big booms and single-digit boomlets.

The Chinese car industry is largely a foreign car industry. According to the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM), the market share of homegrown passenger vehicles is on the decline and down to 37.2 percent. Most of the large joint ventures are in the hands of the central or regional governments.

Take SAIC as a for instance. SAIC produced 3.6 million cars last year. Only 346,525 of those were SAIC’s own. Some 3.3 million mostly raised the volume and income of GM and Volkswagen.

The large joint ventures are busy adding capacity in China as demand cools down. China’s government finds itself aligned with the interests of the world’s major automakers. When push comes to shove, SAIC (Volkswagen, GM), FAW (Volkswagen, Toyota, GM), Dongfeng (Honda, Kia, Nissan, PSA), Chang’an (Ford, Mazda, Suzuki, PSA), BAIC (Daimler, Hyundai), or Guangzhou Auto (Toyota, Honda) are closer to the hearts of the Chinese government than their own smaller independent (or semi-independent) Chinese automakers. The heavily fractionalized Chinese car industry must consolidate, the government had demanded that for years. The wish from above was largely ignored. What the regulators don’t want is new brands and more capacity outside of China’s state-owned sphere. Actually, they wouldn’t mind a little shake-out that increases the volume at the top.

And why should that give Saab heartburns? Saab is under creditor protection. It hopes every day that the NDRC will allow a joint venture with China’s Youngman and car dealer chain Pangda. If a deal between Fuji Heavy and Chery (# 21 and #22 on the list of the world’s largest automakers) has been denied, how do you rate the chances of two companies that aren’t even on that list? If it took the NDRC since May to find out that Toyota has a 16.5 percent stake in Fuji Heavy, how long will it take the NDRC to decide that the Youngman application hasn’t been properly filed, and please submit a new one? If China doesn’t want a 150,000 units Subaru factory, do you think it wants a Saab that is on Swedish life support?

China will take whatever state-of-the art technologies – when they are cheap in a bankruptcy sale. BAIC will be happy to buy it at scrap value. Meanwhile in Sweden, the Saab faithful celebrate Octoberfest. With live Internet-hookup to China...
www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2011/10/mul...

quote:

Ursus arctos schreef:

Saab is zo goed als failliet, er zijn behalve de Chinezen geen partijen die geinteresseerd zijn om de handel te redden. Dwz dat hun onderhandelingspositie meer het dicteren van hun voorwaarden is. Als ze een hoog percentage willen kunnen ze gewoon 1 euro per aandeel bieden voor de huidige aandeelhouders en 100% overnemen, take it or leave it, de enige manier waarop de handel niet failliet gaat en Saab zal er nog blij mee zijn ook.
Echter dan moeten ze vervolgens heel veel geld investeren om de zaak weer op de rails te zetten en zoveel geld willen ze er niet insteken. Ik denk dan ook niet dat dit een scenario is dat ze willen. (zoals ze ook aan hebben gegeven)
Bij"...............