Koos99 schreef op 22 januari 2016 17:25:
[...]
Dat zat inderdaad ook in hun analyse:
Mobileye map is complementary to the far more elaborate TomTom map Short-term planning, ie, what to do in the next second?, is done via sensors: sensors include a range of overlaying technologies that together provide a near perfect overview of the surroundings of the car up to hundreds of meters ahead. The most important technologies are: cameras, lidar, radar, sonar, GPS and beacons that communicate between cars and infrastructure. Companies active in sensors are the tier-1 incumbents including market-leader Bosch (EUR 1bn sales guidance in driver assistance sensors for 2016) and Continental, as well as a newcomer like Mobileye. Their sensors will be capable of creating a large observations database that could be one input for map making. That is why Bosch has partnered with TomTom to create an eco-system with mutually reinforcing assets like the map and sensors. We believe in high levels of standardisation to make sure sensors and maps are compatible. This is not new to the mapping industry. TomTom and HERE both use Navigation Data Standard (NDS) to produce their 2D map in a standardised way. We believe that Mobileye’s user generated observations database as announced at the CES will fit into the ecosystem. The planned Mobileye observation database, when the data is processed correctly on a platform, is what we called the third level map, a low bandwidth map similar to TomTom’s low bandwidth map called Road DNA. Both will use car sensor data for accurate localisation. We believe both platforms in case of standardisation are mutually reinforcing (the more data, the better) and one does not exclude the other. We do not believe that Mobileye’s low bandwidth map will replace TomTom’s ‘level one’ (2D map), given the need for A? B planning and the ‘level two map’ (3D HAD map), which is needed for medium-term driving planning in HAD. As such, we see Mobileye’s technology as complementary.