Eurobench.com

Al Kipone 20 mei 2020 18:26

0

een paar jaar eerder:

July 6, 2018 at 2:45 p.m. EDT

Eight Republicans pick the worst possible place to celebrate July 4

“What does July 4th mean to me? Freedom,” Sen. Ron Johnson chirruped on Twitter on Independence Day.

For the Wisconsin Republican, it meant, specifically, the freedom to spend July 4 in Moscow with seven other Republican lawmakers posing for propaganda photos with Russian officials. On the same day it was reported in Britain that two more people had been poisoned by a Russian nerve agent British officials say came from Vladimir Putin’s regime. On the day after the Senate Intelligence Committee affirmed the U.S. intelligence community’s conclusion that Russia interfered in the election to help Donald Trump.

Johnson and his colleagues apparently exercised their freedom not to meet with opposition or civil society figures (those whom the Putin regime has not imprisoned or killed), avoiding the risk of offending their hosts. They also exercised their freedom to soft-pedal their criticism of the Russian government, leading Russian politicians and state media to mock them as supplicants.

www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/eight...

Al Kipone 20 mei 2020 18:29

0

Over the last three years, Johnson has emerged as one of the president’s most ardent supporters, not just on policy grounds but in his zeal to push many of Trump’s pet obsessions and conspiracy theories. Just this week, Johnson demanded the declassification of a memo from former national security advisor Susan Rice that Trump World imagined was at the center of “Obamagate.” (It turned out to be a dud.)

This was not the first time. Last October, Johnson inadvertently told the Wall Street Journal that had been concerned about Trump’s Ukraine dealings. This slip mortified him so that he made a memorable appearance on Meet the Press to walk it back. Asked over and over why he had been concerned about Trump and Ukraine, Johnson bobbed and weaved until Chuck Todd was reduced to existential despair. “Answer the question that I asked you instead of trying to make Donald Trump feel better here that you’re not criticizing him,” Todd finally begged.

Johnson refused and instead brought up yet another Trump-centric conspiracy theory about the FBI.

But his most recent (and puzzling) about-face has come on the question of inspectors general. Once upon a time, Johnson was one of the most passionate champions of the inspectors general and their role in the federal government.

In 2015, as chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee he pushed for legislation that would strengthen and protect the IGs as they rooted out incompetence and malfeasance.

But this week, as Trump continued to dismantle the infrastructure of the IGs, Johnson has been an outspoken presidential ally. During a Sunday appearance on CNN, he was asked about the purge, including Trump’s decision to fire the State Department’s inspector general at the urging of Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. The IG, Steve A. Linick, had reportedly been investigating allegations of misconduct by Pompeo before he was sacked.

“I’m not crying big crocodile tears over this termination,” Johnson told Jake Tapper. “Let’s put it that way,”

But hadn’t he argued in the past that in the inspectors general should be independent, he was asked? Johnson replied:

I take a slightly different view in terms of what [inspectors general] should be independent from. They need to retain their independence within the agencies, so they can do inspections and investigations and provide that to their leadership, but primarily to the president. And so they serve at the president’s will.” [Emphasis added.]

In other words, the inspectors general should be independent of some parts of the federal government. Just so long as they’re not independent of Trump.

thebulwark.com/the-strange-case-of-ro...

Opentop 20 mei 2020 18:45

0

Als zulke mensen dat Hunter Biden onderzoek gaan doen, komt er zeker niets van terecht. Dit zijn wel gevaarlijke mensen. De meelopers die menen dat Trump ze zal belonen.
Over Hunter las ik een stuk op Business Insider. Hij werd in 2014 opgenomen in Burisma. In 2015 werd de Procureur General Shokin aangesteld. vervolgens in maart 2016 weer ontslagen, volgens de anti corruptie dame uit de Ukraine, juist omdat die weinig deed.
Het lijkt me niet dat er daardoor een link ligt vanuit Burisma, naar Hunter, naar Joe, naar Porosjenko, naar Shokin. Dat de USA van Shokin afwilde geloof ik wel, maar ze dat wilde om Hunter een plezier te doen, geloof ik niet. Ukraine is geen land wat we kunnen/mogen vergelijken met een 200 jaar bestaande democratie. Het lijkt er meer op dat , de manier waarop de staat werd ingericht , door de USA gepusht werd, samen met het westen en ook het IMF stelde voorwaarden.

Wat wel raar blijft is waarom die Hunter zo'n plaats had bij Burisma, hij moet iets bijzonders kunnen. Hij is of gevraagd of hij heeft gesolliciteerd.
Dat staat los van de relatie met zijn vader .

Al Kipone 20 mei 2020 20:39

0

Former Vice President Joe Biden leads President Trump 50 - 39 percent in a head-to-head matchup in the election for president, according to a Quinnipiac University national poll of registered voters released today. That's up from the 49 - 41 percent lead Biden held in an April 8th national poll, but the change is within the margin of error. Democrats go to Biden 88 - 5 percent, Republicans go to Trump 87 - 8 percent, and independents go to Biden 47 - 36 percent.

"What does the 11 point Biden lead tell us? At best for Team Trump, it says voter confidence in President Trump is shaky. At worst for them, as coronavirus cases rise, Trump's judgement is questioned - and November looms," said Quinnipiac University Polling Analyst Tim Malloy.

TRUMP JOB APPROVALS

More than two months into the coronavirus crisis in the U.S., President Trump's job approval rating ticks lower. 42 percent of voters approve of the job President Trump is doing, while 53 percent disapprove. That's compared to a 45 - 51 percent job approval rating he received in April, his highest ever.

On the president's response to the coronavirus, 41 percent of voters approve and 56 percent disapprove. That is down from a 46 - 51 percent approval rating in April.

On the president's handling of the economy, 50 percent approve while 47 percent disapprove, compared to a 51 - 44 percent approval in April.

On his handling of healthcare, although underwater, the president receives his highest approval rating ever, a negative 41 - 54 percent. In April he received a negative 39 - 54 percent approval.

TRUMP VS. BIDEN

Voters are split on who they think would do a better job handling the economy, with 48 percent saying Biden and 47 percent saying Trump. In April, Trump led Biden on this question 49 - 44 percent.

Voters also say 57 - 37 percent that Biden would do a better job than Trump handling health care compared to 53 - 40 percent in April.

Biden outscores Trump on honesty, good leadership skills, and caring about average Americans. Voters say:
Biden is honest 47 - 41 percent, while Trump is not honest 62 - 34 percent;
Biden has good leadership skills 51 - 40 percent, while Trump does not 58 - 40 percent;
Biden cares about average Americans 61 - 30 percent, while Trump does not 56 - 42 percent.
FAVORABILITY RATINGS

Today, Biden receives a slightly positive 45 - 41 percent favorability rating, but this is not significantly changed from his split 43 - 43 percent favorability rating in April. President Trump has a negative 40 - 55 percent favorability rating, compared to a negative 41 - 52 percent favorability rating in April.

Separately, voters were asked about sexual assault allegations leveled against Biden by a former Senate staffer in the 1990's. In recent weeks, Biden has publicly denied the allegations made by Tara Reade. Asked which do you tend to believe most, 28 percent say the accusation made by Tara Reade, 28 percent say the denial made by Joe Biden, and 38 percent say they haven't heard enough about it.

CORONAVIRUS RESPONSE

By a sixteen-point margin, 55 - 39 percent, voters say they think Biden would do a better job than President Trump handling the response to the coronavirus.

poll.qu.edu/national/release-detail?R...

Al Kipone 20 mei 2020 22:03

0

quote:
Al Kipone schreef op 20 mei 2020 15:49:
trump tweets:

Breaking: Michigan sends absentee ballots to 7.7 million people ahead of Primaries and the General Election. This was done illegally and without authorization by a rogue Secretary of State. I will ask to hold up funding to Michigan if they want to go down this Voter Fraud path!..

State of Nevada “thinks” that they can send out illegal vote by mail ballots, creating a great Voter Fraud scenario for the State and the U.S. They can’t! If they do, “I think” I can hold up funds to the State. Sorry, but you must not cheat in elections.

Trump is threatening to somehow withdraw federal aid unless Michigan drops vote-by-mail, a naked effort to extort Michigan into doing something that could help him politically. (Trump rage-tweeted a similar threat at Nevada.)

That last point is crucial. It has been widely reported that Trump’s advisers fear he’s losing Michigan, which he probably needs again, especially with Arizona at risk.

We also know Trump fears vote-by-mail can hurt his chances. Trump explicitly admitted that with such Democratic voting rights measures, “you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again.”

And so, in lodging this threat, Trump is saying the corrupt part out loud — with a bullhorn.

Full coverage of the coronavirus pandemic

There have long been grounds for asking whether Trump has corrupted the process of doling out aid to states. A Post investigation found big disparities in how states are treated, which has left some officials “wondering whether politics is playing a role in the response.”

Now Trump has made the threat as explicit as anyone could imagine.

What Trump threatened is illegal
As a threshold matter, what Trump is threatening is illegal, according to Stephen Vladeck, a law professor at the University of Texas at Austin.

“The federal government does not have the power to withhold funding from states because the president disagrees with something the states are doing,” Vladeck told me. “There’s no legal mechanism by which he can do that.”

Theoretically, Trump might try to do this. Under the Cares Act, which recently passed Congress, states get allotted coronavirus aid money from the Treasury Department, and then subsequently certify that they used it all on coronavirus-related purposes, a spokesperson for the House Appropriations Committee tells me.

So Trump could try to instruct the Treasury Department not to dole out that money. Note that Trump actually cc’d the Treasury Department in his tweet-threat, an act that becomes a lot more disgusting when you understand that this is how the mechanism actually does work.

www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/...

gnocchi. 21 mei 2020 00:41

0

Trump's inname van hydroxychloroquine kan worden gekoppeld aan de belangen van de familie in het bedrijf dat het maakt

DOOR Travis Earle 20 mei 2020

President Trump onthulde eerder deze week aan de wereld dat hij hydroxychloroquine heeft gebruikt , het medicijn tegen malaria waarvan de FDA heeft gewaarschuwd dat het hartproblemen kan veroorzaken. Trump zegt dat hij het medicijn gebruikt om het coronavirus af te weren. Woensdag werd bevestigd dat de dokter van het Witte Huis, Dr. Conely, het potentieel gevaarlijke medicijn aan president Trump heeft voorgeschreven. Nu is er nieuws dat kan onthullen waarom Trump de drug promoot.
Maandag kwam aan het licht dat Trump een financieel belang heeft in het bedrijf dat hydroxychloroquine maakt. Het rapport is ingediend door The New York Times. Sanofi is de naam van het Franse bedrijf dat hydroxychloroquine beter bekend maakt onder de merknaam Plaquenil. De familie Trump heeft een klein aandeel in Sanofi en zij zullen een mooi financieel voordeel behalen als het medicijn een standaardbehandeling wordt.

De New York Times ontdekte de banden van Trump met het bedrijf door naar zijn 2019 Public Branch Personnel Public Financial Disclosure Reports te kijken.

Het geld is afkomstig van drie familietrusts die verbonden zijn met de Trump-familie, die overal fondsen heeft van $ 1.001 en $ 15.000, geïnvesteerd in het Dodge & Cox International Stock Fund. dit rapport is ingediend bij het Amerikaanse Office of Government Ethics. De NYT wees erop dat Sanofi de grootste individuele deelneming in het onderlinge fonds is. "De laatste controle was 3,3%", zei MarketWatch over de omvang van het belang van het fonds.

Dit zal ongetwijfeld meer speculatie veroorzaken over waarom de president een medicijn pusht dat erg gevaarlijk kan zijn voor Amerika. Het zal interessant zijn om te zien welke ethische overwegingen dit kan opleveren.

hillreporter.com/trumps-taking-of-hyd...

het zwaard 21 mei 2020 10:24

0

De Verenigde Staten hebben de verkoop van 18 zware torpedo's aan Taiwan goedgekeurd. De aankoop, voor een bedrag van 180 miljoen dollar, dreigt de relatie tussen de Verenigde Staten en China nog verder te verzuren. De Chinese overheid beschouwt Taiwan als een afvallige provincie.
De verkoop "dient de economische belangen en de nationale veiligheid van de Verenigde Staten", door Taiwan te helpen het leger te versterken en een "geloofwaardige defensiecapaciteit te bewaren", aldus het Amerikaanse ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken. Ook zal de verkoop ertoe bijdragen "de politieke stabiliteit, het evenwicht van de troepen en de economische vooruitgang in de regio te bewaren". Voor Washington is het een strategische prioriteit om de toenemende invloed van Peking in de regio tegen te gaan.
De torpedo's van het type MK-48, ontworpen om afgevuurd te worden door onderzeeërs, moeten niet besteld worden bij een leverancier want ze komen uit de voorraad van de Amerikaanse marine.
De spanningen tussen China en Taiwan gaan al terug tot de oprichting van de volksrepubliek in 1949. China erkent de onafhankelijkheid van Taiwan niet, maar beschouwt het eiland als een afvallige provincie.
Washington verbrak in 1979 de diplomatieke banden met Taipei, maar blijft wel de voornaamste wapenleverancier van de eilandstaat. President Donald Trump maakte geen geheim van zijn intenties om Taiwan gesofisticeerde wapensystemen te verkopen.
Dergelijke wapenverkopen vallen slecht in China, dat Frankrijk onlangs nog waarschuwde dat een wapendeal met Taiwan negatieve gevolgen zou hebben voor de onderlinge relatie.

gbakl 21 mei 2020 13:03

0

De Verenigde Staten hebben de verkoop van 18 zware torpedo's aan Taiwan goedgekeurd. De aankoop, voor een bedrag van 180 miljoen dollar, dreigt de relatie tussen de Verenigde Staten en China nog verder te verzuren...

sambal bij ?

Ed Verbeek 21 mei 2020 13:13

0

Misschien een idee voor Rusland om (samen met China?) weer eens wat raketten op Cuba te zetten
(voor een klein bedrag)

Ook die zeggen dan natuurlijk van die verkoop:
"dient de economische belangen en de nationale veiligheid van de Rusland (en China), door Cuba te helpen het leger te versterken en een geloofwaardige defensiecapaciteit te verkrijgen". "Ook zal de verkoop ertoe bijdragen de politieke stabiliteit, het evenwicht van de troepen en de economische vooruitgang in de regio te bewaren".

luchtschip 21 mei 2020 14:13

0

The Lincoln Project,
Een stroming binnen de Republikeinse Partij,

komt met een nieuwe ad.
Belicht hierin trump's 2020 campagne leider, Brad Parscale (een IT specialist)
Het lijkt erop dat een niet onaanzienlijk deel van de donaties voor Trump's herverkiezing in zijn prive vermogen verdwijnt.
Hij doet ineens grote aankopen het laatste jaar

This is just another example that lDonald Trump
is the worst manager America has ever seen. Don, you got conned (wordt bedrogen) … by your IT guy.

video 0:47 minuut
twitter.com/ProjectLincoln/status/126...

Trump's team zit vol zakkenvullers die de donaties voor eigen gewin gebruiken

luchtschip 21 mei 2020 14:33

0

Digital Ad Makers Making Millions Off Of Trump’s Reelection Campaign

Vendors for the president’s reelection effort have charged at least $12 million more for “digital ads” over the past two years than platforms like Facebook report receiving for them.

John Weaver, a Republican political consultant who worked on the presidential campaigns of John McCain and John Kasich, said he doubts Trump himself is bothered much by all the money going to consultants because his own family is also getting a piece of it.

“I’ve always believed Brad is grifting with the Trump family,” he said, referring to the $180,000 a year flowing to the wife of one of Trump’s adult sons and the girlfriend of the other through campaign manager Brad Parscale’s company.

American Made Media Consultants, which Republican officials have described as a front entity created specifically to buy ads, received $53.6 million in payments related to “digital” or “web” ads, while Parscale Strategy, LLC received $4.8 million. No other company is listed as receiving more than $200,000, according to HuffPost’s analysis

The campaign’s largess toward consultants generally, and to Parscale in particular, has become fodder for the latest ad by Weaver and others behind the Lincoln Project, an anti-Trump super PAC whose previous work has drawn extended, angry rants from Trump.

The 30-second spot, scheduled to air on Fox News in Washington, D.C., Wednesday evening, features Parscale’s spending spree over the past two years as detailed in a recent HuffPost report, which includes a $2.4 million waterfront house, a $400,000 boat, a pair of million-dollar condos, a Ferrari and a Land Rover.

Trump’s campaign and the RNC together have already spent $746 million of the $889 million they have raised since Trump took office. Much of that money has gone for higher-than-average salaries for Trump’s campaign employees — significantly higher than that of other presidential campaigns in recent cycles.

How much, precisely, has gone into Parscale’s pocket is unclear. He has been paid through the companies he owns, rather than as an employee ? $38.9 million since January 2017.

Exactly how much Parscale kept for himself is impossible to know using public records. He told The Washington Post in October that he had made only $400,000 up to that point in the reelection effort. The New York Times in March reported that he was keeping $700,000 to $800,000, an amount Trump had OK’d.

www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-digital-...

Trump's campagne heeft al $ 746 miljoen uitgegeven aan reclames en staat nog 11 procent achter op Joe Biden in de polls

Al Kipone 21 mei 2020 14:40

0

Inside Brad Parscale’s 2020 Plan: Reelect Donald Trump. Make Money. Maybe Not in That Order.
Is the president’s campaign manager a digital savant, or just another opportunist cleaning up on the MAGA movement?

www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/04/...

Consider what Parscale has said about his own compensation this campaign season. He has repeatedly emphasized that he is refusing to take the customary cut of the campaign’s digital ad spending. “I felt like as campaign manager it would seem not very ethical and very good of myself to pay myself a percentage of my decisions,” Parscale told CNN earlier this year. Instead, he said, he is accepting a relative pittance for his efforts: an annual “retainer” of $300,000, plus unspecified bonuses. “I wanted to set a high mark,” he told Breitbart News. As he put it: “I don’t do this for a percentage. I do this for my country and for President Trump.”

But that wasn’t the full story. Parscale’s no-commissions policy did not apply when the client was the Republican National Committee, whose main mission, at least when it comes to employing Parscale’s firm, is reelecting Trump. That work represented $18 million in billings for Parscale Strategy since he was named 2020 campaign manager, dwarfing the $4.8 million his companies have received directly from Trump committees.

www.propublica.org/article/the-myths-...

www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-b...

Al Kipone 21 mei 2020 14:42

0

The coronavirus has killed at least 93,400 people in the United States, according to a New York Times database, and sickened more than 1.5 million.

If the United States had begun imposing social-distancing measures one week earlier in March, about 36,000 fewer people would have died in the pandemic, according to new estimates from Columbia University disease modelers.

And if the country had begun locking down cities and limiting social contact on March 1, two weeks earlier than when most people started staying home, a vast majority of the nation’s deaths — about 83 percent — would have been avoided, the researchers estimated.

The enormous cost of waiting to take action reflects the unforgiving dynamics of the outbreak that swept through American cities in early March. Even small differences in timing would have prevented the worst exponential growth, which by April had subsumed New York City, New Orleans and other major cities, the researchers found.

www.nytimes.com/2020/05/21/us/coronav...

Al Kipone 21 mei 2020 14:47

0

President Trump’s intelligence briefings have gotten renewed attention since he blamed them for failing to sound the alarm early on about the coronavirus.

Mr. Trump has insisted that the intelligence agencies gave him inadequate warnings about the threat of the virus, describing it as “not a big deal.” Intelligence officials have publicly backed him, acknowledging that Beth Sanner, the analyst who regularly briefs the president, underplayed the dangers when she first mentioned the virus to him on Jan. 23.

But in blaming Ms. Sanner, a C.I.A. analyst with three decades of experience, Mr. Trump ignored a host of warnings he received around that time from higher-ranking officials, epidemiologists, scientists, biodefense officials, other national security aides and the news media about the virus’s growing threat. Mr. Trump’s own health secretary had alerted him five days earlier to the potential seriousness of the virus.

By the time of the Jan. 23 intelligence briefing, many government officials were already alarmed by the signs of a crisis in China, where the virus first broke out, and of a world on the brink of disaster. Within days, other national security warnings prompted the Trump administration to restrict travel from China. But the United States lost its chance to more effectively mitigate the coronavirus in the following weeks when Mr. Trump balked at further measures that might have slowed its spread.

www.nytimes.com/2020/05/21/us/politic...

January 23....
March 1.....
83% minder doden.
en (stel ik) een aanzienlijke kleinere economische schade.

Wow.

luchtschip 21 mei 2020 15:12

0

nou breekt mijn klomp

per Capita ( per hoofd van de bevolking )

Trump :

"When you say per capita, there's many per capitas. Is this like per capita relative to what?"

How did this guy made it through elementary school?

video 0:07 minuut
twitter.com/Nicoxw1/status/1263244665...

Wharton (university) professor William Kelley had Trump in zijn klas :

"Donald Trump was the dumbest goddam student I ever had "

pbs.twimg.com/media/EYf0eGSWsAEkg2i?f...

luchtschip 21 mei 2020 15:37

0

Pompeo disregarded the advice of high-level officials at State, Pentagon and the IC in invoking an emergency waiver last year to circumvent congressional review of billions in arms sales to the Gulf

twitter.com/dave_brown24/status/12632...

Senior officials advised against Trump emergency arms sales to Saudis

The dispute is now at the center of an inspector general's probe into whether the deal was conducted legally.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo disregarded the advice of high-level officials at the State Department, Pentagon and within the intelligence community in invoking an emergency waiver last year to circumvent congressional review of billions of dollars in arms sales to the U.S. allies in the Persian Gulf region, according to two former administration officials and three congressional sources.

That decision was under investigation by a government watchdog who was fired last week at Pompeo’s urging, and it has fueled renewed accusations from lawmakers that the Trump administration bucked the will of Congress and even violated the law when it fast-tracked the weapons sales. The secretary of state is facing intense scrutiny over the inspector general’s ouster, which has unleashed a flurry of negative stories and a torrent of criticism on Capitol Hill.

In justifying the move to Congress, Pompeo wrote that "Iranian aggression” and “increasing regional volatility” necessitated an urgent delivery of certain weapons to U.S. partners in the Middle East.

But during meetings last spring of the National Security Council at several levels, high-level career and political officials from the Pentagon, State Department and intelligence community agreed that there had been no change in Tehran’s behavior to justify invoking emergency authorities and advised against doing so, according to a former administration official who attended the meetings.

"There is nothing going on right now that we could point to that would say it was any different than the month before,” the former official said.

www.politico.com/news/2020/05/20/mike...

luchtschip 21 mei 2020 16:10

0

38,6 miljoen werkeloosheid aanvragen tijdens de corona pandemie in de US

Weekly Jobless claims total 2.4 million, still elevated levels but a declining pace from previous weeks

First-time filings for unemployment insurance totaled 2.44 million last week, about in line with economist estimates.
That brings the total filings during the coronavirus pandemic to 38.6 million.
However, the total has fallen for seven straight weeks from its record peak.

www.cnbc.com/2020/05/21/us-weekly-job...

Al Kipone 21 mei 2020 16:59

0

Trump, who has consistently trailed in Michigan polls against presumptive Democratic nominee Joe Biden, was asked if he is concerned about the message he is sending by threatening Michigan as it is going through a flooding emergency.
Trump's response: "No, I'm not. I'm -- no, I'm not concerned at all. We're going to help Michigan. Michigan is a great state. I've gotten tremendous business to go to Michigan. Michigan is one of the reasons I ran. I was honored in Michigan long before I thought about -- I was honored as the Man of the Year in Michigan at a big event."
He continued: "I remember so well." He claimed this happened at an event about five or six years before he thought about running for president, where he gave a speech decrying the loss of Michigan auto business to Mexico. "And I posed many questions to Michigan that night, and I think it think made quite an impression," he said.

Trump started telling versions of the Man of the Year story two days before Election Day in 2016, when he was making a successful effort to win a state no Republican presidential candidate had carried since 1988.
Journalists tried and failed to figure out what he was talking about. (For one, the state does not have an official Man of the Year award. For two, Trump had never lived in Michigan.) In an August 2019 telling, Trump himself said he had been confused about why he had supposedly gotten the award: "I said, 'How come?' I didn't even understand it myself."
Then a former Republican congressman from Michigan, Dave Trott, contacted CNN and other news outlets to solve the mystery.
Trott offered a convincing explanation: Trump was talking about his speech at an event Trott had organized, a Lincoln Day dinner for Republicans in Oakland County, Michigan, in 2013.
There, Trott said, Trump gave a "rambling" address resembling the one he says he did -- and Trott gave him a framed copy of Lincoln's Gettysburg Address and other gifts. But Trott did not give him any Man of the Year award, and nor did anyone else.

dus even samenvatten: trump gaat naar Michigna, zegt dat hij van de staat houdt, zeker na de dambreuk, en zegt dan van alles over zichzelf, en daarna herhaalt hij een verzonnen verhaal, over zichzelf, om te illustreren hoeveel compassie hij heeft met de mensen in Michigan. Die hij zojuist heeft bedreigd.

Ok then.

www.cnn.com/2020/05/21/politics/fact-...

Ed Verbeek 21 mei 2020 17:00

0

quote:
luchtschip schreef op 21 mei 2020 15:12:
nou breekt mijn klomp
per Capita ( per hoofd van de bevolking )

Trump :
"When you say per capita, there's many per capitas. Is this like per capita relative to what?"
video 0:07 minuut
twitter.com/Nicoxw1/status/1263244665...

ja, die is weer mooi.
Reactie die ik zag: “ it's per capita relative to how many heads each person has.”

Al Kipone 21 mei 2020 17:13

0

Governor Michigan ("that woman") heeft ook zo haar gedachten :

Gov. Whitmer on CBS: "Threatening to take money away from a state that's hurting as bad as we are right now is just scary, and I think something that's unacceptable. And my hope is that today he will be in Michigan, he will see ... we need the support of our federal government."

AEX 904,92 -6,42 -0,70% 15:05


Germany40^	22.636,20	-1,62%
BEL 20	4.378,67	-2,03%
Europe50^	5.415,81	-0,96%
US30^	42.421,20	-0,88%
Nasd100^	19.687,90	-2,48%
US500^	5.669,14	-1,72%
Japan225^	36.533,10	-2,01%
Gold spot	2.902,83	-0,24%
EUR/USD	1,0835	-0,13%
WTI	66,69	-0,45%

JDE PEET'S	+3,22%
WDP	+2,48%
Eurocommercia...	+2,32%
UNILEVER PLC	+2,12%
Ahold Delhaize	+1,93%

EBUSCO HOLDING	-6,95%
ASMI	-5,19%
IMCD	-5,02%
Avantium	-5,01%
ArcelorMittal	-4,07%

Koffiekamer « Terug naar discussie overzicht

TRUMP

Meedoen aan de discussie?

Direct naar Forum

Markt vandaag

Aandelenadviezen van IEX.nl

Stijgers

Dalers

Nieuws Forum