Galapagos « Terug naar discussie overzicht

koers Galapagos 2013

4.219 Posts, Pagina: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 ... 207 208 209 210 211 » | Laatste
[verwijderd]
0
Oei, oei, JAR51.....niet al te best ingelezen in GLPG.

DARWIN staat voor Drug Against Rheumatoid Arthritis With Selective JAK1 INhibition
Er komen vooralsnog 3 DARWINS.

DARWIN 1, is 0634 en methotrexate (MTX) samen (en placebo)

DARWIN 2, is alleen 0634 (en placebo)

DARWIN 3, is de follow up study

Voor de rest, toch maar inlezen.
Rekyus
0
Hernieuwde weigering door CHMP van de afgifte handelsvergunning voor Xeljanz 25 juli 2013

Summary: On 25 April 2013, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) adopted a negative opinion, recommending the refusal of the marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Xeljanz, intended for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. The company that applied for authorisation is Pfizer Limited.

The applicant requested a reâ??examination of the opinion. After considering the grounds for this request, the CHMP re-examined the initial opinion, and confirmed the refusal of the marketing authorisation on 25 July 2013.

Zie voor uitgebreidere info de bijgevoegde EMA-mededeling van 26 juli jl.

Rekyus
Bijlage:
[verwijderd]
0
Veiligheid, de hoofdreden voor afwijzing.

De JAK1 van GLPG scoort juist hoog op het gebied van veiligiheid.
[verwijderd]
0
quote:

stappa schreef op 28 juli 2013 17:29:

Veiligheid, de hoofdreden voor afwijzing.

De JAK1 van GLPG scoort juist hoog op het gebied van veiligiheid.
T'is toch echt JANK1 hoor
[verwijderd]
1
quote:

stappa schreef op 28 juli 2013 17:29:

Veiligheid, de hoofdreden voor afwijzing.

De JAK1 van GLPG scoort juist hoog op het gebied van veiligiheid.
Gunstig dus voor ons ;-)
Rekyus
2
Successor to Humira? AbbVie and Galapagos work on it.

By Peter Geschek, writer for Seeking Alpha 26 July 2013

AbbVie's Humira is now the best-selling drug in the world with global sales of more than $2.2 billion in the first quarter of 2013, up 17% from the same period of the previous year. AbbVie and Belgian company Galapagos are developing a new, orally available drug that may become the successor to Humira.

GLPG0634
In 2012, AbbVie (then still Abbott Labs licensed the rights to GLPG0634, a selective JAK-1 (Janus kinase-1) inhibitor from Galapagos NV. Abbott paid a fee of $150 million upfront and will pay another $200 million upon successful completion of the rheumatoid arthritis Phase 2 studies.
AbbVie will assume sole responsibility for the Phase 3 trials. Galapagos would be eligible to receive additional milestone payments from AbbVie, potentially amounting to $1.0 billion, in addition to tiered double-digit royalties on net sales upon commercialization. The stiff price paid underscores the significance attached to the new drug.
The deal gives AbbVie access to what may be the best in a "new wave" of pills against a disease that's now treated with injections. GLPG0634 is an orally-available, novel Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor with selectivity for JAK1 developed by Galapagos.
JAKs are critical components of signaling mechanisms utilized by a number of cytokines and growth factors, including those that are elevated in rheumatoid arthritis patients. JAK inhibitors have shown long-term efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis studies with an early onset of action.
GLPG0634 is different from other JAK inhibitors in development that it specifically targets JAK1, a strategy that may result in a better efficacy and safety profile.

Crohn's disease added
AbbVie and Galapagos have recently agreed to expand their collaboration to include Crohn's disease. Galapagos plans to fund and launch a midstage study of GLPG0634 in Crohn's disease by early 2014, with results expected by the middle of 2015. Upon successful completion of the trial, AbbVie will pay Galapagos $50 million. The Crohn's trial is expected to run in parallel with the rheumatoid arthritis study. The Crohn's study will be a 20-week, Phase 2 a & b trial enrolling 180 patients. It will measure both the rate of disease remission and the maintenance of its beneficial effects.
Crohn's disease is a type of inflammatory bowel disease in which the well-controlled balance of the intestinal immune system is disturbed. The disease causes ulcerations of the small and large intestines, but may affect any part of the digestive system from mouth to anus. The cause of the disease is unknown and there is no cure. It starts usually between the ages of 15 and 35. Patients suffer from abdominal pain, diarrhea (often bloody), vomiting, fever, and weight loss.
Treatment options today are restricted to controlling symptoms, and preventing relapse by the use of drugs that suppress the inflammation or the immune system, antibiotics, and eventually surgical removal of the inflamed bowels. The disease affects a million people in Europe and more than 500,000 people in the U.S.
The Janus kinases are a family of enzymes that play a key role in the signaling mechanism used by a number of cytokines that are involved in autoimmune diseases. By inhibiting JAK1, GLPG0634 blocks signaling for several key pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 6 (IL-6).
The fact that it avoids inhibition of JAK2 is a unique advantage as inhibition of JAK2 has shown anemia and reduced formation of blood cells in trials. Crohn's sufferers already have blood loss often from gastrointestinal bleeding.
Underlying its interest in the field, AbbVie in a separate development has signed a collaboration deal with Alvine. Alvine is developing a new drug in celiac disease. Celiac disease is another autoimmune disorder that involves inflammation in the GI tract. Alvine Pharma is a San Carlos, California-based, privately-held company.
Humira, as you recall, is approved, among other things, for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

Early results
At the annual EULAR (European League Against Rheumatism) conference in Madrid, Galapagos presented early results of a 4-week Phase 2a dose ranging, multi-center trial of GLPG0634 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Safety and efficacy of doses from 75 - 300 mg was well tolerated, with an absence of the typical side effects reported with other JAK inhibitors: there was no anemia, no overall change to LDL (the so-called bad cholesterol) or ALT (a liver function test), also there was no neutropenia (low level of certain white blood cells). The 150 mg group showed a robust response.
However, the 4-week duration of the trial was too short to reach a meaningful conclusion from scores such as pain assessment, global assessment, HAQ-DI (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index). Larger and longer term studies in arthritis are being initiated.

Competition
Developing JAK inhibitors is very much in fashion among big pharma companies, including Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Novartis).
Currently the market for drugs against rheumatoid arthritis is dominated by injections such as Humira, Johnson & Johnson's Remicade and Amgen Inc.'s Enbrel, which Pfizer shares. These injections block a protein called TNF, that is overproduced by patients with the condition.
The recent CHMP's (Europe's Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use) negative opinion on Pfizer's Xeljanz highlights the importance of having an established clinical presence in autoimmune diseases. CHMP has advised not to approve Xeljanz to treat rheumatoid arthritis, advice which Pfizer immediately appealed. Humira benefits from this kind of publicity and it should continue to grow as biologics gain deeper penetration in the autoimmune markets driven by aggressive treatment strategies.
At EULAR, Eli Lilly and Incyte presented a 52-week update on their baricitinib's Phase 2b rheumatoid arthritis study.
Analysts at JMP Securities note that efficacy of the Jak-1&2 inhibitor remained consistent between weeks 24 and 52, indicating a strong durability of benefit. The rates of infection were also similar.
While the data is encouraging and, according to analysts at BMO Capital, on par with biologics and Pfizer's Xeljanz, barcitinib is at least three years behind Xeljanz. The Phase 3 program is set to complete in the second half of 2014, with data expected on patients who have inadequately responded to biologics.

Investor's summary
AbbVie is highly dependent on Humira sales, which in 2012 came in at $9.3 billion. AbbVie's total revenues in the first quarter of 2013 were $4.32 billion, Humira sales represent some 51% of that. While sales are forecast to reach $10 billion for the current year, Humira is coming close to the end of its patent exclusivity.
Based on Abbott's SEC filing, the U.S. composition of matter (that is compound) patent for Humira is expected to expire in December 2016 and in the majority of the European countries by April 2018. Humira being a biological drug, a biosimilar competition could still be further away.
AbbVie is projecting a diluted earnings-per-share for 2013 of $2.66 to $2.76 on a GAAP basis.

Conclusion: AbbVie's immediate future is well-secured. However, it is not easy to develop another blockbuster in a couple of years. If the new oral equivalent of Humira proves to be safe and covers most of the injected drug's indications, that would go a long way to improve AbbVie's prospects.

It's a long way to Tipperary....
Rekyus
[verwijderd]
0
quote:

Rekyus schreef op 29 juli 2013 09:51:

Successor to Humira? AbbVie and Galapagos work on it.

By Peter Geschek, writer for Seeking Alpha 26 July 2013

AbbVie's Humira is now the best-selling drug in the world with global sales of more than $2.2 billion in the first quarter of 2013, up 17% from the same period of the previous year. AbbVie and Belgian company Galapagos are developing a new, orally available drug that may become the successor to Humira.

GLPG0634
In 2012, AbbVie (then still Abbott Labs licensed the rights to GLPG0634, a selective JAK-1 (Janus kinase-1) inhibitor from Galapagos NV. Abbott paid a fee of $150 million upfront and will pay another $200 million upon successful completion of the rheumatoid arthritis Phase 2 studies.
AbbVie will assume sole responsibility for the Phase 3 trials. Galapagos would be eligible to receive additional milestone payments from AbbVie, potentially amounting to $1.0 billion, in addition to tiered double-digit royalties on net sales upon commercialization. The stiff price paid underscores the significance attached to the new drug.
The deal gives AbbVie access to what may be the best in a "new wave" of pills against a disease that's now treated with injections. GLPG0634 is an orally-available, novel Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor with selectivity for JAK1 developed by Galapagos.
JAKs are critical components of signaling mechanisms utilized by a number of cytokines and growth factors, including those that are elevated in rheumatoid arthritis patients. JAK inhibitors have shown long-term efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis studies with an early onset of action.
GLPG0634 is different from other JAK inhibitors in development that it specifically targets JAK1, a strategy that may result in a better efficacy and safety profile.

Crohn's disease added
AbbVie and Galapagos have recently agreed to expand their collaboration to include Crohn's disease. Galapagos plans to fund and launch a midstage study of GLPG0634 in Crohn's disease by early 2014, with results expected by the middle of 2015. Upon successful completion of the trial, AbbVie will pay Galapagos $50 million. The Crohn's trial is expected to run in parallel with the rheumatoid arthritis study. The Crohn's study will be a 20-week, Phase 2 a & b trial enrolling 180 patients. It will measure both the rate of disease remission and the maintenance of its beneficial effects.
Crohn's disease is a type of inflammatory bowel disease in which the well-controlled balance of the intestinal immune system is disturbed. The disease causes ulcerations of the small and large intestines, but may affect any part of the digestive system from mouth to anus. The cause of the disease is unknown and there is no cure. It starts usually between the ages of 15 and 35. Patients suffer from abdominal pain, diarrhea (often bloody), vomiting, fever, and weight loss.
Treatment options today are restricted to controlling symptoms, and preventing relapse by the use of drugs that suppress the inflammation or the immune system, antibiotics, and eventually surgical removal of the inflamed bowels. The disease affects a million people in Europe and more than 500,000 people in the U.S.
The Janus kinases are a family of enzymes that play a key role in the signaling mechanism used by a number of cytokines that are involved in autoimmune diseases. By inhibiting JAK1, GLPG0634 blocks signaling for several key pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 6 (IL-6).
The fact that it avoids inhibition of JAK2 is a unique advantage as inhibition of JAK2 has shown anemia and reduced formation of blood cells in trials. Crohn's sufferers already have blood loss often from gastrointestinal bleeding.
Underlying its interest in the field, AbbVie in a separate development has signed a collaboration deal with Alvine. Alvine is developing a new drug in celiac disease. Celiac disease is another autoimmune disorder that involves inflammation in the GI tract. Alvine Pharma is a San Carlos, California-based, privately-held company.
Humira, as you recall, is approved, among other things, for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

Early results
At the annual EULAR (European League Against Rheumatism) conference in Madrid, Galapagos presented early results of a 4-week Phase 2a dose ranging, multi-center trial of GLPG0634 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Safety and efficacy of doses from 75 - 300 mg was well tolerated, with an absence of the typical side effects reported with other JAK inhibitors: there was no anemia, no overall change to LDL (the so-called bad cholesterol) or ALT (a liver function test), also there was no neutropenia (low level of certain white blood cells). The 150 mg group showed a robust response.
However, the 4-week duration of the trial was too short to reach a meaningful conclusion from scores such as pain assessment, global assessment, HAQ-DI (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index). Larger and longer term studies in arthritis are being initiated.

Competition
Developing JAK inhibitors is very much in fashion among big pharma companies, including Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Novartis).
Currently the market for drugs against rheumatoid arthritis is dominated by injections such as Humira, Johnson & Johnson's Remicade and Amgen Inc.'s Enbrel, which Pfizer shares. These injections block a protein called TNF, that is overproduced by patients with the condition.
The recent CHMP's (Europe's Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use) negative opinion on Pfizer's Xeljanz highlights the importance of having an established clinical presence in autoimmune diseases. CHMP has advised not to approve Xeljanz to treat rheumatoid arthritis, advice which Pfizer immediately appealed. Humira benefits from this kind of publicity and it should continue to grow as biologics gain deeper penetration in the autoimmune markets driven by aggressive treatment strategies.
At EULAR, Eli Lilly and Incyte presented a 52-week update on their baricitinib's Phase 2b rheumatoid arthritis study.
Analysts at JMP Securities note that efficacy of the Jak-1&2 inhibitor remained consistent between weeks 24 and 52, indicating a strong durability of benefit. The rates of infection were also similar.
While the data is encouraging and, according to analysts at BMO Capital, on par with biologics and Pfizer's Xeljanz, barcitinib is at least three years behind Xeljanz. The Phase 3 program is set to complete in the second half of 2014, with data expected on patients who have inadequately responded to biologics.

Investor's summary
AbbVie is highly dependent on Humira sales, which in 2012 came in at $9.3 billion. AbbVie's total revenues in the first quarter of 2013 were $4.32 billion, Humira sales represent some 51% of that. While sales are forecast to reach $10 billion for the current year, Humira is coming close to the end of its patent exclusivity.
Based on Abbott's SEC filing, the U.S. composition of matter (that is compound) patent for Humira is expected to expire in December 2016 and in the majority of the European countries by April 2018. Humira being a biological drug, a biosimilar competition could still be further away.
AbbVie is projecting a diluted earnings-per-share for 2013 of $2.66 to $2.76 on a GAAP basis.

Conclusion: AbbVie's immediate future is well-secured. However, it is not easy to develop another blockbuster in a couple of years. If the new oral equivalent of Humira proves to be safe and covers most of the injected drug's indications, that would go a long way to improve AbbVie's prospects.

It's a long way to Tipperary....
Rekyus
[verwijderd]
0
IEX doet raar met plaatsen

Probeerde er aan toe te voegen : Bedankt voor het plaatsen .Topstuk met mooi overzicht .

Onbegrijpelijk dat de koers zo laag blijft hangen .
[verwijderd]
0
Kijk . Wederom op het laatste moment met een kleine 1000 stukjes 0,07 naar beneden gebracht . Volgens mij mag het niet hard stijgen .
harrysnel
0
@Rekyus: seeking alpha artikel is al van 17 juni 2013. Waarom (opnieuw) plaatsen en met andere datering?

seekingalpha.com/article/1506352-succ...

Veel waardering voor dit artikel maar kan iemand mij deze zin uitleggen?

The 150 mg group showed a robust response.

Als je naar deze groep kijkt dan scores vergelijkbaar en soms zelfs slechter dan placebo (acr20, acr50, haq-di):

www.glpg.com/index.php/download_file/...
Rekyus
0
@harrysnel: het artikel is niet door mij gedateerd, maar door de auteur Geschek (of eventueel Seeking Alpha) en wel op 26 juli jl. om welke reden dan ook (zoals revisie van eerdere publicatie?).

De uitspraak van Geschek is bijna letterlijk gebaseerd op de informatie door Galapagos verstrekt. Zie de poster voor de onlangs gehouden EULAR conferentie. Onder 'Discussion and conclusions' staat de volzin: 'the most severely diseased 150 mg group showed a robust response in CRP, TJC and SJC'. Daarop volgt de mededeling dat ‘However, the 4-week duration of ?the trial was too short to reach the full potential on patient-reported scores (pain, global, HAQ-DI).’

A contrario redenerend moet het duidelijk zijn dat de uitspraak op de robuuste werkzaamheid van de 150 mg dosis slaat op de eerste 4 weken van de behandeling, terwijl het overzicht met de scores is gebaseerd op een totaalmeting bepaald ná 4 weken: Zie vermelding onder het overzicht met staafdiagrammen: ‘Figure 1: Efficacy summary after 4 weeks of treatment.’

Rekyus



harrysnel
0
@Rekyus: dank voor je antwoord. Als ik specifiek op 26 juli Google krijg ik geen treffer, wel verwijzing naar artikel met datum 17 juni. Ook seeking alpha geeft alleen die datum bij overzicht artikelen van Geschek:

seekingalpha.com/author/peter-geschek...

Had het artikel al eerder voorbij zien komen vandaar mijn verbazing. Was ook geen linkje bij het door jouw geplaatste stuk.. Maakt verder niet uit.

Ik snap waar de auteur het stukje over de 150mg groep vandaan heeft gehaald. Vind dat auteur verkeerde indruk wekt door te spreken over robuustheid maar dat dan niet verder uitwerkt. Dit schrijft hij:

Early results
At the annual EULAR (European League Against Rheumatism) conference in Madrid, Galapagos presented early results of a 4-week Phase 2a dose ranging, multi-center trial of GLPG0634 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Safety and efficacy of doses from 75 - 300 mg was well tolerated, with an absence of the typical side effects reported with other JAK inhibitors: there was no anemia, no overall change to LDL (the so-called bad cholesterol) or ALT (a liver function test), also there was no neutropenia (low level of certain white blood cells). The 150 mg group showed a robust response.
However, the 4-week duration of the trial was too short to reach a meaningful conclusion from scores such as pain assessment, global assessment, HAQ-DI (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index). Larger and longer term studies in arthritis are being initiated.


ACR-score is nu eenmaal primary endpoint en daar ligt wat mij betreft het grootste probleem van het onderzoek: score 150mg groep op ACR. Dat is ook de reden waarom deze groep nader besproken wordt onder het kopje "discussie en conclusies" door Galapagos. Daar gaat auteur compleet aan voorbij.

Verder merkwaardige zin:
Safety and efficacy of doses from 75 - 300 mg was well tolerated,..

Effectiviteit die goed getolereerd wordt?
Loureiro
0
Publicatie halfjaarcijfers :
Op de website van Binck zie ik 2 augustus staan als datum daar waar op de website GLPG 9 augustus vermeld staat. Ik veronderstel dat 9 augustus de juiste datum is.
Zoals gewoonlijk zal naast het goede nieuws dat reeds gecommuniceerd is het negatieve nieuws vermeld worden. Zoals iemand op het forum reeds meldde zal dit waarschijnlijk het stopzetten van het onderzoek van 0187 zijn maar analisten hebben dit reeds ingecalculeerd. Bijgevolg denk ik dat deze halfjaarresultaten een non event zullen zijn voor de koers.
Rekyus
0
@harrysnel. De stelling van de auteur is niet onjuist, er ontbreekt slechts sterk inhoudelijke achtergrondinformatie om deze te staven. Een snelle lezer van diens artikel zal daar blij om zijn.

De ACR score is instrumenteel om een ‘clinical endpoint’ bepalen, maar de uitkomsten daarvan zijn niet op voorhand doorslaggevend. Ik lees onder kopje ‘Discussion and conclusions’ in de EULAR-poster geen woord dat wijst in de richting dat de ACR score nu net de reden zou zijn om apart aandacht te besteden aan de 150 mg groep. Mogelijk dat een dergelijke toespeling wel door het management is gedaan tijdens een conference-call. Dat heb ik niet nagegaan. Mocht dat zo zijn, dan hoor ik dat graag.

Welke scores straks voor EMA/CHMP resp. FDA doorslaggevend zullen zijn bij hun oordeel over de risico-baten balans, weet ik niet. Wel is het zo dat tegenwoordig farma-bedrijven of CRO’s in het stadium van fase 2 onderzoek al contact met de toelatingsautoriteiten zoeken en om advies vragen over de onderzoeksopzet en de te gebruiken parameters. Mocht Galapagos dat gedaan hebben, dan heeft men ongetwijfeld nu al een idee welke scores het meeste gewicht in de schaal zullen leggen bij de uiteindelijke beoordeling van ‘safety and efficacy’.

Grammaticaal vliegt de auteur Geschek inderdaad uit de bocht, wanneer hij spreekt over ‘safety and efficacy …. was well tolerated’. Maar als criticaster vlieg je ook (lichtjes) uit de bocht als je de begrippen ‘efficacy’ (werkzaamheid) en ‘effectiveness’ (oftwel effectiviteit) als zijnde uitwisselbaar hanteert. Deze twee begrippen zijn niet voor 100% synoniem, zoals kenners van het klinisch onderzoek goed weten. Dit lijkt me echter niet het forum om deze materie verder uit te diepen.

Rekyus
[verwijderd]
0
Weer hetzelfde als gisteren .
In een zeer korte tijd gedrukt van day high naar zelfs iets in de min .
100% gestuurd . Bedankt hoor .heel knap
[verwijderd]
1
quote:

abelheira schreef op 30 juli 2013 15:19:

Bijgevolg denk ik dat deze halfjaarresultaten een non event zullen zijn voor de koers.
Ik zie dat anders,zeker geen non event.
Onno en Guillaume hebben nog wat belangrijke cijfertjes te melden. Tijdens de webcast van de jaarcijfers 2012 wisten ze beide te vertellen dat de outlook voor 2013, met de tot dan bekende business, duidelijk zicht geeft op € 160 mln omzet en winstgevendheid voor 2013. Echter de cijfers kunnen sterk beinvloed worden door de mogelijks deals die aanstaande zijn en nog niet in de outlook zijn verwerkt.

Een deal hebben we gehad, de aanvullende Abbvie deal van $ 20mln. De andere moet nog komen. Daarnaast hebben we de emissie gehad die duidelijk impact heeft op de cashpositie, die ook nog niet is vastgesteld als guidance voor 2013.

Tijd dus om de outlook 2013 vast te stellen en wat is een beter moment dan bij de halfjaar cijfers.

Onno, grijp je kans!!
Loureiro
0
quote:

bioscience schreef op 30 juli 2013 17:37:

Weer hetzelfde als gisteren .
In een zeer korte tijd gedrukt van day high naar zelfs iets in de min .
100% gestuurd . Bedankt hoor .heel knap
Aan de prijs van 16,25 worden er blijkbaar heel wat aandelen verhandeld tussen 2 partijen!
diederique
0
crucell in het achterhoofd houdend kan 16,25 wel eens de basis vormen voor een eventuele overname.....

quote:

abelheira schreef op 31 juli 2013 11:16:

[...]
Aan de prijs van 16,25 worden er blijkbaar heel wat aandelen verhandeld tussen 2 partijen!
[verwijderd]
0
16,25 lijkt me wel een hele lage basis , waar geen enkele aandeelhouder mee akkoord gaat . Of ze moeten er 100% bij op tellen , waardoor een bod van rond de 30 euro op tafel komt .

Ik denk dat nu dat die ene shorter de boel in toom probeert te houden door iedere keer op het juiste moment wat te drukken .Dat lukt nu nog makkelijk , omdat het volume laag is door de vakantie . Als het aan mij ligt gaat ie flink nat na een mooi bericht, tenzij ze op tijd weten te kopen .
4.219 Posts, Pagina: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 ... 207 208 209 210 211 » | Laatste
Aantal posts per pagina:  20 50 100 | Omhoog ↑

Meedoen aan de discussie?

Word nu gratis lid of log in met uw e-mailadres en wachtwoord.

Direct naar Forum

Detail

Vertraagd 7 feb 2025 17:35
Koers 22,080
Verschil 0,000 (0,00%)
Hoog 22,460
Laag 21,960
Volume 65.330
Volume gemiddeld 113.676
Volume gisteren 65.330

EU stocks, real time, by Cboe Europe Ltd.; Other, Euronext & US stocks by NYSE & Cboe BZX Exchange, 15 min. delayed
#/^ Index indications calculated real time, zie disclaimer, streaming powered by: Infront