Koffiekamer « Terug naar discussie overzicht

In gold we trust

459 Posts, Pagina: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 19 20 21 22 23 » | Laatste
[verwijderd]
0
THE WORLD ACCORDING TO THE GOLDBUG NEWSLETTER WRITER (UPDATED CRISIS EDITION)

Event Analysis Effect recommendation

Dow under 8,000 Had to happen; crooks getting justice people need the safe haven of gold
BUY GOLD!

Rebound in Dow the plan is working, the economy is safe expansion of economy will help gold
BUY GOLD!

DEFLATION! things getting cheaper people have more money left over to spend on gold
BUY GOLD!

INFLATION! things will be more expensive tomorrow people will rush to spend their money on gold
BUY GOLD!

oil now cheap great news at the pumps people have more money left over to spend on gold
BUY GOLD!

oil on the rise at long last! commodity reflation the whole commodity sector is sure to follow
BUY GOLD!

uneconomic mines closing down great news! Supply is crimping less gold coming to market
BUY GOLD!

mines stay on schedule for opening excellent! Lots of industry confidence mine managers know the real story here
BUY GOLD!

US Congress bails out Detroit smart move; US gov't assures employment Wealth for all is the only way BUY GOLD!

US Congress lets Detroit fall smart move; spend more on productive sectors the US sees reality at last. Real market forces to rule
BUY GOLD!



[verwijderd]
0
Bring back the link between gold and the dollar
By Richard Duncan

Published: November 23 2008 19:07 | Last updated: November 23 2008 19:07

The events of September 2008 – the nationalisation of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and AIG; the disappearance of the investment banking industry in the US; and the Bush administration’s $700bn bailout to save what is left of Anglo-American capitalism – demonstrate that the 37-year experiment with fiat money and floating exchange rates has failed catastrophically.

When Richard Nixon destroyed the Bretton Woods International Monetary System in 1971 by closing the “gold window” at the Treasury, he severed the last link between dollars and gold. What followed was a spiralling proliferation of increasingly spurious credit instruments denominated in a debased currency. The most glaring and lethal example of this madness has been the growth of the unregulated derivatives market, which has ballooned in size to $600,000bn, the equivalent of almost $100,000 per person on Earth.

Under the post-Bretton Woods dollar standard, credit growth powered economic growth. In the US, the ratio of total credit to gross domestic product rose from 150 per cent in 1969 to 350 per cent in 2007. Credit financed consumption and sucked in imports with a devastating impact on America’s trade balance. By 2006, the US current account deficit had reached almost $800bn.

As the dollar standard flooded the world with funny money, economic instability spread around the globe. The reinvestment of “petrodollars” created the Latin American economic boom in the 1970s and then the third world debt crisis of the 1980s. Japan’s trade surplus with the US drove up Japanese property prices in the late 1980s until the imperial gardens in Tokyo were worth more than California; and then produced the lost decade in Japan when that bubble popped in 1990. Next came the rise and fall of the Asian miracle bubble. Each economic convulsion resulted from the excessive influx of dollars into those economies. No regulatory regime could cope when confronted with such an extraordinary incursion of exogenous money.

The Bretton Woods collapse severed the link between the world’s currencies and gold. Central banks were then free to create as much money as they wished. Between 2001 and today, central banks outside the US created the equivalent of about $6,000bn. This can be seen in the seven-fold increase in foreign exchange reserves in that period. The money created (which accounted for most, if not all, of Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke’s so-called global savings glut) was used to buy dollars and suppress the value of the currencies of US trading partners to perpetuate their trade advantage.

When those dollars were reinvested in dollar-denominated assets, it was America’s turn to bubble. As central banks bought up US treasury bonds, they drove up their price and drove down their yields. However, there were not enough new Treasury bonds being issued to absorb the rest of the world’s trade surplus earnings, so central banks bought Fannie and Freddie debt as well. That allowed those government-sponsored enterprises to acquire or guarantee more than half of all the mortgages in the country before they failed. Between unnaturally depressed interest rates and the buying spree by Fannie and Freddie, US property prices surged. The US housing bubble followed the ill-fated Nasdaq bubble. However, the inflation of the US housing market was one bubble too far. When it imploded, the global financial system was hurled into crisis, leaving the 21st century version of Anglo-American financial capitalism discredited.

The lesson that must be learnt from this disaster is that “free market” capitalism under a fiat money regime does not produce the same blessings (sustainable prosperity) that are produced by true free market capitalism within a monetary system anchored by gold. When President Nixon severed the link between the dollar and gold, he changed the nature of the Anglo-American economic model and ultimately destroyed it.

The world cannot return to a gold standard overnight without provoking a brutal contraction of credit and a global depression. However, neither can we afford to pretend that nothing has changed and that the global economy can continue to function on the dollar standard. The time has come to convene a forum of the world’s leaders to hammer out and begin the transition to a new rule-based international monetary system predicated on sound money and balanced trade. Current Group of 20 efforts fall well short of what is required.

The writer is author of The Dollar Crisis: Causes, Consequences, Cures

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2008
[verwijderd]
0
Liever, hang de euro aan goud, maar doe het stilletjes en kom er dan opeens mee:P
[verwijderd]
0
[verwijderd]
0
Gold will hit $1,200 in 2009
Posted: November 26, 2008, 9:00 AM by Diane Francis

Gold is gaining on T-bills as a safety play and the precious metal began its move as trillions of bailout commitments translate into major currency debasement. I asked a smart investor and he said "gold will break through US$1,200 an ounce in 2009".

Another new development is that articles about returning to a gold standard are popping up in credible periodicals, as compared to goldbug blogs like the "Daily Reckoning". What's interesting to note is that the gold standard would suit the Americans the most, given their Fort Knox treasure trove which has remained untouched for hundreds of years and is the largest cache of gold in history. Here are the largest gold reserves holdings in tonnes as reported by the World Gold Council.

The top 10 central bank reserves total 26,014.4 tonnes, or 836.3 million troy ounces, equivalent to US$836.4 billion. By contrast, the market capitalization of all stock markets is 5% of that. Here are the gold reserves figures of the top ten:

United States has 8,965.6 tonnes
Germany, 3,767.1 tonnes
International Monetary Fund, 3,546.1 tonnes
France, 2,890.6 tonnes
Italy, 2,702.5 tonnes
Switzerland, 1,285.6 tonnes
Japan, 743.5 tonnes
Netherlands, 688.4 tonnes
European Central Bank, 666.5 tonnes
China, 661.4 tonnes
(Also of note is that if gold jewelry were counted, India would have the most gold reserves in the world with an estimated 13,000 tonnes.)

Best analysis of gold standard
On Nov. 23, Richard Duncan wrote the best piece in the Financial Times about returning to the gold standard, and why. "The events of September 2008 – the nationalisation of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and AIG; the disappearance of the investment banking industry in the US; and the Bush administration’s $700bn bailout to save what is left of Anglo-American capitalism – demonstrate that the 37-year experiment with fiat money and floating exchange rates has failed catastrophically.
"When Richard Nixon destroyed the Bretton Woods International Monetary System in 1971 by closing the “gold window” at the Treasury, he severed the last link between dollars and gold. What followed was a spiralling proliferation of increasingly spurious credit instruments denominated in a debased currency. The most glaring and lethal example of this madness has been the growth of the unregulated derivatives market, which has ballooned in size to $600,000bn, the equivalent of almost $100,000 per person on Earth.
"Under the post-Bretton Woods dollar standard, credit growth powered economic growth. In the US, the ratio of total credit to gross domestic product rose from 150 per cent in 1969 to 350 per cent in 2007. Credit financed consumption and sucked in imports with a devastating impact on America’s trade balance. By 2006, the US current account deficit had reached almost $800bn.
"As the dollar standard flooded the world with funny money, economic instability spread around the globe the U.S. dollar reinvestment of “petrodollars” created the Latin American economic boom in the 1970s and then the third world debt crisis of the 1980s. Japan’s trade surplus with the US drove up Japanese property prices in the late 1980s until the imperial gardens in Tokyo were worth more than California; and then produced the lost decade in Japan when that bubble popped in 1990. Next came the rise and fall of the Asian miracle bubble. Each economic convulsion resulted from the excessive influx of dollars into those economies. No regulatory regime could cope when confronted with such an extraordinary incursion of exogenous money.
"The Bretton Woods collapse severed the link between the world’s currencies and gold. Central banks were then free to create as much money as they wished. Between 2001 and today, central banks outside the US created the equivalent of about $6,000bn. This can be seen in the seven-fold increase in foreign exchange reserves in that period. The money created (which accounted for most, if not all, of Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke’s so-called global savings glut) was used to buy dollars and suppress the value of the currencies of US trading partners to perpetuate their trade advantage.
"When those dollars were reinvested in dollar-denominated assets, it was America’s turn to bubble. As central banks bought up US treasury bonds, they drove up their price and drove down their yields. However, there were not enough new Treasury bonds being issued to absorb the rest of the world’s trade surplus earnings, so central banks bought Fannie and Freddie debt as well. That allowed those government-sponsored enterprises to acquire or guarantee more than half of all the mortgages in the country before they failed. Between unnaturally depressed interest rates and the buying spree by Fannie and Freddie, US property prices surged. The US housing bubble followed the ill-fated Nasdaq bubble. However, the inflation of the US housing market was one bubble too far. When it imploded, the global financial system was hurled into crisis, leaving the 21st century version of Anglo-American financial capitalism discredited.
"The lesson that must be learnt from this disaster is that “free market” capitalism under a fiat money regime does not produce the same blessings (sustainable prosperity) that are produced by true free market capitalism within a monetary system anchored by gold. When President Nixon severed the link between the dollar and gold, he changed the nature of the Anglo-American economic model and ultimately destroyed it.
"The world cannot return to a gold standard overnight without provoking a brutal contraction of credit and a global depression. However, neither can we afford to pretend that nothing has changed and that the global economy can continue to function on the dollar standard. The time has come to convene a forum of the world’s leaders to hammer out and begin the transition to a new rule-based international monetary system predicated on sound money and balanced trade. Current Group of 20 efforts fall well short of what is required."
[verwijderd]
0
Gold: the recovery has begun but long-term forecasts still range widely

Vancouver - The yellow metal might have underperformed over the last few months but recent price increases have prompted analysts to predict at least a short-term rally for gold, whether major markets head into recession or recovery.

The last few months excluded, it has been an epic year for gold. In March, after a sustained climb, the precious metal broke the US$1,000-per-oz. barrier for three days. Through the middle of the year the price stayed above US$850 per oz. A sudden drop in September foreshadowed the economic mayhem to come, but even then it spent much of the month near US$900.

But when the financial crisis hit for real in October, the price of gold fell along with everything else. After flirting with $900 per oz at the beginning of the month the price collapsed, hitting its lowest in over a year of US$712 per oz. on Oct. 24. Many investors were taken by surprise, having been told for years that when all else fails people turn to gold as a secure investment.

The price of gold remained depressed for almost a month, during which time trading was highly volatile. But by mid-November the price started to climb back up, including a few record one-day gains. Now most research groups are predicting a slowly gaining, relatively stable gold price over the short term. As for the long term, predictions range from $650 to $2,000. But to understand predictions of what’s to come, one must first understand what just happened.

Key to gold’s poor performance over the last few months is the role of institutional players and investment funds. Faced with red balance sheets, institutions and funds needed cash and so they sold gold. In fact, they sold almost anything for which they could find buyers; gold can always be easily liquidated so it got hit hard.

Adding to the apparent correlation between world equity markets and the price of gold, some wealthy investors and funds sold gold to meet margin calls, cover losses on major investments gone bad, or simply wind down and return initial cash contributions to investors. A few large banks even got into the gold-selling fray, for the same reason: to raise needed capital and increase liquidity.

And even though the price of gold was down some 24% compared to its March high, other commodities – not to mention stocks – were down further, which meant gold sales were an avenue by which to minimise losses. As such gold’s relatively strong performance made it more of a target.

It appears that the October-November wave of sustained liquidation of long gold futures has abated, likely because positions are exhausted. On the flip side, new buyers have emerged. One important one is the People’s Bank of China, which is considering increasing gold reserves nearly seven-fold from its current 600 tons to 4,000 tons to spread the risks in its huge foreign exchange holdings. And Indian jewelry demand remains strong.

Another major influence on the price of gold is the strength of the US dollar. Massive injections of liquidity by the government have driven a recovery in the US dollar of late, but this recovery is likely going to be short-lived. As Jeffrey Nichols, manager of American Precious Metals Advisors, puts it, “The US government is printing money so fast, cash is not even a safe bet any more…The massive infusion of liquidity is ultimately going to lead to a massive spike in capital flows and an upward pressure on inflation.”

Inflation is good for gold prices: it drives the value of the dollar down and so encourages people to seek a safer refuge for their savings. Gold is a classic safe haven. And with the US Federal Reserve expected to cut interest rates to 0.75% from 1% in mid-December, bullion’s appeal is on the rise as an alternative investment to the US currency.

Interestingly, deflation is also good for gold. Deflation is a persistent reduction in the general price level, not just for goods and services but also for most commodities, real estate, equities and other assets. It stems from declining demand and an unwillingness to spend. During deflationary periods savings – and safe savings investments like gold – grow. As such gold is well-positioned as both an inflation and deflation hedge.

Then there is the actual supply-demand side of the equation. Based in part on China’s plans for a strategic gold reserve, Welling West Capital Markets is forecasting a structural deficit in gold supplies, which will push prices up.

The analysts behind the report – Catherine Gignac, Paolo Lostritto, John Miniotis, and Ryan Walker – note that investment demand for physical gold increased by 179% in the third quarter, compared to last year, and that bullion dealers in many parts of the world reported “severe stock shortages of bars and coins”.

And they believe the change will be significant: “Given the potential change in market fundamentals, we believe it is time investors revisit investing in the junior and intermediate gold producers.”

It seems some investors never stopped thinking of gold as a safe place to stow away money. According to the World Gold Council, demand for gold reached an all-time high of US$32 billion in the third quarter. The huge deleveraging of commodities by hedge funds and institutions more than offset the massive demand, hence the drop in price, but the demand means investors – including the all-important Indian jewellery market – took advantage of gold’s depressed price, buffered its drop, and in doing so set the stage for its rise.

So where is the price going from here? Predictions are all over the map.

In their latest note Fortis Investment Research analysts wrote, “Gold is getting almost impossible to call, with daily price moves of $20 per oz. no longer rare. We’re mildly bullish, as the dollar’s rally is likely to run out of steam. But when will that be?”

The group set its 1-month forecast at US$730 to $820 per oz. Fortis then predicts a price of US$825 over 2009, falling to US$800 for 2010, and foresee a gold price of just US$650 from 2011 on.

Haywood Securities is pretty much on-par with Fortis. Haywood's analysts are more bullish on gold on 2009, forecasting an average price of US$900 per oz, but in 2010 they predict the price will fall to US$700 and agree with Fortis that in the long term the price will settle to just US$650 per oz.

Genuity Capital Marlets analysts see the future a bit differently: they are less bullish in the short term but more so in the long run. “With safe haven buying of the US dollar, unwinding of the long commodity trade, and plummeting inflation expectations expected to continue in the near term, it is increasingly difficult to remain overly bullish on bullion in the short term.”

Genuity’s analysts forecast gold prices of $740 per oz. for 2009 and US$751 per oz. for 2010, with the average price rising some US$25 per year until 2013.

Resource Capital Research, an Australian group, has a slightly more bullish outlook. They see prices moving between US$750 and US$850 per oz. over the next month, moving up to US$900 an oz. in 2009. Nichols, the manager of American Precious Metals Advisors mentioned earlier, predicts prices of US$1,000 per oz. “sooner rather than later”, but hesitates to be more specific.

The most bullish predictions, however, come from Citigroup, the research branch of the mega American bank that was gasping for a
[verwijderd]
0
The most bullish predictions, however, come from Citigroup, the research branch of the mega American bank that was gasping for air when the US government handed it the largest bailout package in history: US$20 billion on top of the US$25 billion that bank picked up in October.
In a Nov. 26th research note Citigroup chief strategist Tom Fitzpatrick argued for a bull gold market because of gold’s flexibility. He says if the massive monetary and fiscal bailouts of late successfully reflate the global economy, gold will benefit by acting as a hedge against inflation. On the other hand, if rescue plans fail and economic instability worsens, gold will see upside because of its safe haven status.

“We continue to believe that a move of similar percentage to that seen in the 1976-1980 bull market can be seen, which would suggest a price north of $2,000 [per oz.],” Fitzpatrick wrote. He cautioned, though, that Citigroup is not forecasting an imminent move towards $2,000; rather, it is a scenario likely to unfold in the next few years.

Whatever happens, it is clear that gold remains a key player in the global economy and that analyzing or predicting its price is a difficult game.
[verwijderd]
2
quote:

Gung Ho schreef:

THE WORLD ACCORDING TO THE GOLDBUG NEWSLETTER WRITER (UPDATED CRISIS EDITION)

Event Analysis Effect recommendation

Dow under 8,000 Had to happen; crooks getting justice people need the safe haven of gold
BUY GOLD!

Rebound in Dow the plan is working, the economy is safe expansion of economy will help gold
BUY GOLD!

DEFLATION! things getting cheaper people have more money left over to spend on gold
BUY GOLD!

INFLATION! things will be more expensive tomorrow people will rush to spend their money on gold
BUY GOLD!

oil now cheap great news at the pumps people have more money left over to spend on gold
BUY GOLD!

oil on the rise at long last! commodity reflation the whole commodity sector is sure to follow
BUY GOLD!

uneconomic mines closing down great news! Supply is crimping less gold coming to market
BUY GOLD!

mines stay on schedule for opening excellent! Lots of industry confidence mine managers know the real story here
BUY GOLD!

US Congress bails out Detroit smart move; US gov't assures employment Wealth for all is the only way BUY GOLD!

US Congress lets Detroit fall smart move; spend more on productive sectors the US sees reality at last. Real market forces to rule
BUY GOLD!

Howdy,

Je hebt 'n lekke band en moet verder lopen. Je komt voorbij 'n goudwinkel die je nog nooit eerder had gezien: BUY GOLD

Je koopt nieuwe band. Spaart geld met 3 goeie banden niet te vernieuwen: BUY GOLD

De t.v. doet 't niet meer. Meer tijd om te piekeren over de toekomst: BUY GOLD

Je koopt 'n nieuwe t.v. en ziet docu over goud: BUY GOLD

Je hebt ruzie met je ega, je kan er niet meer tegen, levensmoe: BUY GOLD

Je ega vraagt vergiffenis, I love you, I love you, je koopt 'n gouden ketting voor haar: BUY GOLD

Je krijgt opslag: BUY GOLD

Je wordt onslagen: BUY GOLD

Houdoe: BUY GOLD

>--:-)-->
[verwijderd]
1
Hi Amor
Deze is wel leuk.
je zou nog kunnen aanvullen met:
Je bent een beetje misselijk: BUY GOLD
Je hebt een beetje koppijn: BUY GOLD
Je bent aan de schijterij: BUY GOLD
enz..
quote:

Amor Arrows schreef:

...Howdy,
Je hebt 'n lekke band en moet verder lopen. Je komt voorbij 'n goudwinkel die je nog nooit eerder had gezien: BUY GOLD
Je koopt nieuwe band. Spaart geld met 3 goeie banden niet te vernieuwen: BUY GOLD
De t.v. doet 't niet meer. Meer tijd om te piekeren over de toekomst: BUY GOLD
Je koopt 'n nieuwe t.v. en ziet docu over goud: BUY GOLD
Je hebt ruzie met je ega, je kan er niet meer tegen, levensmoe: BUY GOLD
Je ega vraagt vergiffenis, I love you, I love you, je koopt 'n gouden ketting voor haar: BUY GOLD
Je krijgt opslag: BUY GOLD
Je wordt onslagen: BUY GOLD
Houdoe: BUY GOLD
>--:-)-->
[verwijderd]
0
Fear triggers gold shortage, drives US treasury yields
below zero The investor search for a safe places to store wealth as the financial crisis shakes faith in the system has caused extraordinary moves in global markets over recent days, driving the yield on 3-month US Treasuries below zero and causing a rush for physical holdings of gold. By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
Last Updated: 9:26AM GMT 11 Dec 2008

"It is sheer unmitigated fear: even institutions are looking for mattresses to put their money until the end of the year," said
Marc Ostwald, a bond expert at Insinger de Beaufort.
The rush for the safety of US Treasury debt is playing havoc with America's $7 trillion "repo" market used to manage
liquidity. Fund managers are hoovering up any safe asset they can find because they do not know what the world will look
like in January when normal business picks up again. Three-month bills fell to minus 0.01pc on Tuesday, implying that
funds are paying the US government for protection.
"You know the US Treasury will give you your money back, but your bank might not be there," said Paul Ashworth, US
economist for Capital Economics.
The gold markets have also been in turmoil. Traders say it has become extremely hard to buy the physical metal in the
form of bars or coins. The market has moved into "backwardation" for the first time, meaning that futures contracts are
now priced more cheaply than actual bullion prices.
It appears that hedge funds in distress are being forced to cash in profits on gold futures to cover losses elsewhere or to
meet redemptions by clients. But smaller retail investors – and perhaps some big players – are buying bullion in record
volumes to store in vaults.
The latest data from the World Gold Council shows that demand for coins, bars, and exchange traded funds (ETFs)
doubled in the third quarter to 382 tonnes compared to a year earlier. This matches the entire set of gold auctions by the
Bank of England between 1999 and 2002.
Peter Hambro, head Peter Hambro Gold, said the data reflects a "remarkable" shift in the structure of the market. The
rush to safety reflects a mix of fears about the fragility of world finance and concerns that the move towards zero interest
rates could set off an inflationary surge further down the road, and possibly call into question the worth of some paper
currencies.
The near paralysis in the "repo" markets may prove to be no more than pre-Christmas jitters as banks square their books.
However, there are some signs that extreme monetary stimulus by the US Federal Reserve and other banks is starting to
have unintended consequences.
The Bank of Japan is it is reluctant to cut its rates to zero again because of the damage this causes to the money
markets, which serve as a key lubricant of the credit system. The US is now starting to face the same dilemma.

[verwijderd]
0
Hier over zilver info er zijn op dit moment een aantal bijzonder belangrijke ontwikkelingen gaande waarvan een aantal gegevens op dit moment op hun juistheid worden gecontrolleerd. Wellicht morgenavond tijdens de live sessie met Bill al wat onthullingen.

A Specific Issue By: Theodore Butler

The swirl of controversy continues to surround the alleged Madoff fraud and the failure of the SEC to uncover and deal with the scam years earlier. Media coverage has been non-stop and congressional hearings have commenced. Perhaps one of the most comprehensive articles, tying the Madoff/SEC connection in with the general state of the financial world appeared in the Op-Ed section of this Sunday’s NY Times. The article, titled "The End Of The Financial World As We Know It" was co-authored by Michael Lewis and David Einhorn, two highly-regarded observers of the financial scene.

(http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/04/opinion/04lewiseinhorn.html?_r=2&hp) The best thing about the article was that it was two-part, with the second part titled. "How To Repair A Broken Financial World." It’s one thing to describe a problem and quite another to offer specific remedies. For this, the authors must be congratulated.

There were some striking similarities in the article between Madoff and the SEC and the allegation of a silver manipulation and the CFTC. Substitute silver for Madoff, and CFTC for SEC, and I think you can visualize the silver manipulation with clarity. The long-term nature of the frauds, the amount of money involved, previous outside warnings, and the obviousness in each, if one would only look with clear eyes. While I urge you to read it in full, I would like to highlight one aspect of the article, namely, the structural inability of either the SEC or CFTC to move against large financial institutions engaged in active criminal activity.

The authors explained that this inability may be due to many things, including a staff inexperienced in complex financial dealings. The article was also among the first to mention the inherent conflict of interest between the career stepping stone that exists for SEC (and CFTC) personnel moving to the private sector. Who wants to move aggressively against a potential employer or establish a reputation that alienates many potential employers? The article cited the move of the former chief of the Enforcement Division of the SEC to general counsel of JP Morgan. In addition to many similar moves by former personnel in the CFTC to private industry, what could be more conflicted than a former Chairman of the CFTFC moving to become CEO of the NYMEX/COMEX? The authors did propose restrictions on such moves as one of their solutions. I would agree.

I believe there are many other obstacles working against the CFTC conducting a fair and impartial investigation of the silver manipulation. For one thing, the CFTC has never busted up a manipulative crime in progress, they only appear on the scene after the damage has been done. I don’t think they are capable of stopping a crime in progress, no matter how egregious the manipulation. Making matters worse is their past consistent denial that anything is wrong in silver. How embarrassing will it be for them to now admit they were wrong after so many years? Even when they "announced" the onset of the current investigation back in September (via a leak to the Wall Street Journal), they indicated that they were still skeptical that anything was amiss in silver. Then why waste taxpayer money to investigate at all? I’ll tell you why. - because the allegations are based upon specific evidence.

Because the CFTC has backed itself into a corner with their past findings in silver, the only thing that could possibly force them to alter their stance is credible and specific evidence of manipulation. That evidence is the level of concentration on the short side of COMEX silver. It is credible because it is the Commission’s own data. It is specific because it shows the positions held by just a few traders. Smaller concentrated positions have served as the basis for all past charges of manipulation by the CFTC, so the silver concentration can’t be easily brushed aside. Even now, months into the latest investigation, no one (inside or outside the CFTC) has stepped up to explain how one or two U.S. banks holding 25% of the world production of any commodity could not be manipulative.

I know many suggest that I harp on this issue of concentration repetitively. That is true, it’s intentional. The key is specificity. Engage the CFTC in some broad debate on whether silver is manipulated and they will have your head spinning. If you don’t believe me, just reread their official responses in May of both 2004 and 2008. Look, I know silver has been and is manipulated in price, as do many of you. So what? The trick is to have it confirmed by the CFTC or by market action. One of the two is coming, maybe both. And all because of the issue of concentration.

To that end, let me introduce some new and specific evidence of a manipulation in silver, via concentration. Once again, the evidence is from the CFTC itself, in the form of their weekly Commitment of Traders Reports. In spite of the ongoing investigation and a higher level of awareness of the issue of concentration, the last two COT reports have indicated a level of concentration more extreme than in almost six years. The four largest short traders in COMEX silver futures now hold a net short position of more than 47% of the entire market. You have to go back to March 2003 to find a higher level of concentration.

And this number greatly understates the true level of concentration by these four large traders because the CFTC doesn’t subtract spreads from their calculations. Once all spreads (the listed non-commercial and imputed commercial) are removed, as they should be, the true concentrated position of the 4 largest shorts rises to more than 65%. I’d like to see anyone contend that a few traders holding 65% of any market does not dominate or control that market.

I started writing publicly about the concentrated short position in COMEX silver in early 2000, before Investment Rarities began underwriting my research. It has always been the central proof of manipulation in silver. The fact that the unique concentration on the short side of silver is still in place and has grown more extreme is proof of the manipulation and the only explanation for the low price. It is the issue that matters. That’s because the minute this short concentration ends, the manipulation ends. Someday the concentration and, therefore, the manipulation will no longer exist. Then the price of silver will be free, not manipulated. The free price will bear no resemblance to the manipulated price. I think that day is close at hand, primarily because so many are becoming aware of this issue.

If you don't trust GOLD,the only asset with a 6000 year track record, do you trust the logic of taking a $1,000 pine tree, cutting it up, turning it to pulp, putting some ink on it, and then calling it one billion $ dollars?
[verwijderd]
0
Hier weer wat info over het Christen marxistische vrindje van Sinterklaas Balkenellende en zijn VU kameraadje Zwarte Wouter hoe Gordon net als zijn polderkameraden het UK goud heeft verkwanseld.

The true cost of Gordon's gold sell-off

The decision to sell off UK reserves apparently cost almost £5bn
The assiduous Chris Hope, Whitehall editor of the Daily Telegraph, has finally got to the bottom of how much Gordon Brown's decision to sell off part of Britain's gold reserves actually cost the country - a staggering £4.7bn.

That's more than twice previous estimates.

At the prime minister's Downing Street press conference in May last year, I asked Brown whether he regretted the move, but he insisted it had been prudent to enure the nation had a more balanced portfolio.

According to today's report, Brown sanctioned the sale of 395 tonnes of the UK's gold between 1999 and 2002. Hope wrote:

The total proceeds from the sales was around $3.5bn. According to a parliamentary answer, if the gold was sold last month, on Dec 15, it would have fetched $10.5bn. The difference $7bn - would be worth £4.7bn if the proceeds were converted into sterling yesterday.

Phillip Hammond, the shadow chief secretary to the Treasury, said: "Gold traders confirm that it was because the government announced in advance that it was planning to sell such a large quantity of gold that the markets became depressed. The low price Gordon Brown got for selling our gold wasn't caused by bad luck. It was a staggering display of economic incompetence."

If you don't trust GOLD,the only asset with a 6000 year track record, do you trust the logic of taking a $1,000 pine tree, cutting it up, turning it to pulp, putting some ink on it, and then calling it one billion $ dollars?

[verwijderd]
0
Firm offers fund denominated in gold
By James Mackintosh and Javier Blas
Financial Times
Thursday, January 29, 2009
A hedge fund has begun offering investors the chance to have their investment denominated in gold, as worries grow over governments debasing their currencies by printing money.

Osmium Capital Management, a $178m hedge fund manager based in Bermuda, is launching a new share class allowing investors to hold shares measured as troy ounces of the fund, rather than US dollars, sterling or euros.

The move follows a surge in investor demand for small gold bars and coins held by individuals and gold-backed exchange-traded funds that are holding a record amount of bullion.

This week London spot gold prices hit a 3½-month high above $900 an ounce and set all-time highs in sterling and euro terms as investors rushed into the metal. Gold on Wednesday traded at $886.75 an ounce.

Chris Kuchanny, Osmium chief executive and a former London ABN Amro trader, said he was putting almost all his personal wealth into the new share class: “Investors have voiced concerns that they’re overly exposed to the major fiat [paper] currencies in an environment where the fundamentals of those currencies are clearly deteriorating with governments assuming more debt and having lower revenue and more expenditure.”

The gold share class will be hedged into the fund, just as the sterling and euro classes are. So a 10 per cent rise in the fund should turn 100 ounces of the share class into 110, minus hedging costs estimated at 0.1-0.2 per cent a year.

Several other hedge fund managers have voiced concerns about the impact of the printing of money and have begun investing in gold but no other funds are thought to have gold-denominated shares.

David North, head of asset allocation at Legal & General Investment Management, the UK’s biggest institutional investor, said the $500m offshore and onshore hedge funds he runs had a third of their value-at-risk in gold. “Inevitably low interest rates lead to a gold bubble,” he said, pointing out that the major cost of owning gold was the income that could have been earned from investing elsewhere.

London’s RAB Capital has a $30m hedge fund which aims to provide the return on gold plus extra from gold-related trading strategies, but its shares are denominated in traditional currencies
_________________
If you don't trust GOLD,the only asset with a 6000 year track record, do you trust the logic of taking a $1,000 pine tree, cutting it up, turning it to pulp, putting some ink on it, and then calling it one billion $ dollars?
[verwijderd]
0
Het kan verkeren een van de beruchte Hannibals geeft nu zowaar een positief signaal voor GOUD af sinds de Val(letje) van Rubin lijkt de NWO nu wel slagzij te maken...

Goldman Sachs lifts gold price forecast to $1,000/oz
Thu Feb 5, 2009 12:55am GMT
SINGAPORE, Feb 5 (Reuters) - Investment bank Goldman Sachs
(GS.N: Quote, Profile, Research) raised its forecast for the price of gold <XAU=> to
reach $1,000 an ounce in the next three months from its
previous forecast of $700 due to rising investor demand for
safe haven assets.
"The gold price rally has been driven by surging demand for
gold in all forms: physical gold, exchange-traded funds (ETFs),
and futures contracts as investors seek 'a safe store of value'
amid the financial distress and inflation risks," it said in a
report.
It also noted that a strong relationship betwween the price
of gold in U.S. dollars and the exchange rate of the dollar
agsinst other currencies has begun to break down. Gold was
trading at $903.15 an ounce by 0038 GMT, down $1.70 from New
York's notional close.
(Reporting by Lewa Pardomuan; Editing by Jan Dahinten)
_________________
If you don't trust GOLD,the only asset with a 6000 year track record, do you trust the logic of taking a $1,000 pine tree, cutting it up, turning it to pulp, putting some ink on it, and then calling it one billion $ dollars?
[verwijderd]
0
Owning GLD Can Be Hazardous to Your Wealth
by Dave Kranzler

Given that the stated amount of gold in the GLD Trust has grown to over 850 tons, it appears that a lot of investors believe and trust that investing in GLD is the same thing as buying physical gold bullion. A close reading and analysis of the GLD Prospectus, however, reveals that investing in GLD is drastically different from owning gold. This analysis will show why GLD is nothing more than another form of a derivative security which is loaded with counter-party default risk. Ultimately, the value of the GLD Trust, and the price of its stock, has the potential to experience substantial loss. Under certain circumstances GLD could be worthless. As an investment advisor, I do not recommend that anyone use GLD instead of buying physical gold because it is not an investment in gold and the legal structure of GLD is such that unsuspecting investors could end up losing all of their money. Furthermore, because the risks embedded in GLD are documented in the GLD Prospectus, investment advisors who recommend GLD and use it in client portfolios are exposing themselves to the risk of negligence lawsuits.

Introduction

GLD is a legal trust designed to track the price of gold, net of trust expenses. The Sponsor is the World Gold Trust Services (World Gold Council), the Trustee is The Bank of New York, the Custodian is HSBC Holdings and the Marketing Agent is State Street Global Agents (State Street Bank). My source of research is the S1 Prospectus filed on November 15, 2004.

GLD is a “derivative” because it is a piece of paper that is supposed to move with – or is derived from - the movement of the underlying asset, which is gold. It is also a derivative because unless a shareholder owns 100,000 shares, a GLD shareholder can never take physical possession of any GLD gold.

As shown below, the Trust has been legally structured in a way which makes it impossible to determine if the gold in the Trust is being leased. This is a huge problem because, if the Trust is indeed leasing gold, it could become difficult for the Trust to replace the leased gold in the event that the counter-party leasing the gold defaults. Furthermore, in the event that the Custodian becomes insolvent, and the gold has indeed been leased out by the subcustodians, shareholder's have almost no legal ability to seek recovery from the Trust/Custodian.

GLD does not even promise that the gold is in the Trust

The biggest problem with GLD is there is no way to legally force the Trustee/Custodian to prove that the gold being kept by the Custodian is in the Custodian's vault. The Custodian has the ability to use “subcustodians” to safekeep the gold. The subcustodians are permitted to use their own subcustodians to safekeep the gold.

The Trustee/Custodian/Subcustodian relationship is where the validity of GLD disintegrates into a maze of legal barriers which ultimately prevent anyone from physically verifying that the GLD Trust holds anything more than promises of gold. In other words, GLD has been set up by the Sponsor and Trustee, and the structure approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, in a manner which would allow GLD subcustodians to lease out the gold being held by subcustodians, thus leaving nothing in GLD but lease-receivables.

I'll start from the top and work down. The Trustee, upon reasonable notice, is permitted to visit the the Custodian's vaults and examine the Custodian's records twice a year. From the prospectus:

The ability of the Trustee to monitor the performance of the Custodian may be limited because under the Custody Agreements the Trustee may, only up to twice a year, visit the premises of the Custodian for the purpose of examining the Trust's gold and certain related records maintained by the Custodian. (p. 37)

The auditor may also visit the Custodian's premises in connection with their audit of the financial statements of the Trust - the auditor does not audit the actual gold. Please note that Trustee and auditor visits “will not be allowed when no gold of the Trust is held in the Custodian's vault.” (p. 48). For clarification, this could occur when all of the GLD Trust gold is being held by subcustodians, who then turn could around and lease the gold. Just as the Trustee has limited oversight of the Custodian, the Custodian has limited responsibility and no oversight of the subcustodians:

The Custodian is required to use reasonable care in selecting subcustodians, but otherwise has no responsibility in relation to the subcustodians appointed by it, and the Custodian is not responsible for their selection of further subcustodians. The Custodian does not undertake to monitor the performance by subcustodians of their custody functions or their selection of additional subcustodians. The Custodian is not responsible for the actions or inactions of subcustodians (p. 44)

In addition to the above problems, and in what I believe is negligence on the part of the SEC, neither theTrustee nor the Custodian has any legal ability whatsoever to monitor or visit the premises of any subcustodians, or subcustodians of the subcustodians, for purposes of verifying that subcustodians are holding what they are supposed to be holding:

In addition, the Trustee has no right to visit the premises of any subcustodian for the purposes of examining the Trust's gold or any records maintained by the subcustodian, and no subcustodian is obligated to cooperate in any review the Trustee may wish to conduct of the facilities, procedures, records or creditworthiness of such subcustodian." (p.37)

To make matters worse, the Prospectus states that there will be no written contractual agreements between subcustodians and the Custodian or the Trustee (page 11-12). The Prospectus further states quite clearly that “because neither the Trustee nor the Custodian oversees or monitors the activities of subcustodians who may hold the Trust's gold, failure by the subcustodians to exercise due care in the safekeeping of the Trust's gold could result in a loss to the Trust.” (p. 12).

As thus can be seen from its legal structure, the Trust does not have any legal safeguards in place to keep subcustodians from leasing out the GLD gold. As of the date of this prospectus, the subcustodians being used were: Bank of England, The Bank of Nova Scotia (ScotiaMocatta), Deutsche Bank AG, JPMorgan Chase Bank, and UBS AG (p. 47). Please note that all of these banks actively lease gold.

Shareholder Recourse

The Trust has been structured to make it difficult, if not impossible, for shareholders to seek recovery from losses which could occur from Custodian/subcustodian negligence or outright fraud. Shareholder recourse against the Trust is limited (p. 11). The Trust will not insure the gold. The Custodian is responsible for insurance and “shareholders can not be assured that the Custodian will maintain adequate insurance” (p. 11). Furthermore, “Custodian and the Trustee will not require any direct or indirect subcustodians to be insured or bonded” with respect to gold held by the subcustodians on behalf of the Trust (p. 11). “Consequently, a loss may be suffered with respect to the Trust's gold which is not covered by insurance and for which no person is liable in damages” (p. 11). If subcustodians are used outside of the U.S., it may be difficult or impossible to seek legal remedy against the subcustodians (p. 12). This is signi
[verwijderd]
0
This is significant because the Custodian's primary vault is in London. The subcustodians' vaults can be anywhere in the world.

A further, and not inconsequential, source of risk is the possible insolvency of the Custodian, HSBC. As described on page 13 of the Prospectus, “if the Custodian becomes insolvent, its assets may not be adequate to satisfy a claim by the Trust...In addition, in the event of the Custodian's insolvency, there may be a delay and costs in incurred identifying the bullion held in the Trust's allocated gold account." On the surface, this makes it sound like the GLD Trustee can make a specific claim on those bars on behalf of the Trust. But let's examine this a little further. That there may be a “delay and costs incurred identifying bars in the Trust's allocated gold account” undoubtedly refers to the possibility that allocated bars may be held by subcustodians. And if these subcustodians have leased out those bars, it will take substantial time to call in those bars. Worse, if the subcustodians fail to return leased gold to the Custodian, there are no contractual agreements which enforce subcustodian performance by the Custodian. As noted above, the Custodian can not be held liable for actions of the subcustodians, thereby leaving GLD shareholders in line with other creditors in the event HSBC files for bankruptcy.

Yet another loophole in the GLD Prospectus which allows the gold to be leased

In consulting about this report with James Turk, a well-known precious metals market analyst and the founder of GoldMoney, Mr. Turk discovered another loophole in the legal language of the Prospectus which further bolsters the case to be made that the GLD Trust leases out its gold:

I'm reading the Aug 2008 prospectus, but it's probably the same in earlier ones. It can be found in Use of Proceeds on page 3 (and in various other places too), which states: "Proceeds received by the Trust from the issuance and sale of Baskets consist of gold deposits and, possibly from time to time, cash." Note the word "deposits". This word has a precise meaning in the law, and is the exact opposite of "bailment". To explain, if you deposit dollars in a bank, the bank gives you a certificate of deposit, checking account statement, savings book or some other evidence of its debt to you. You no longer own those dollars; the bank now owes them to you. Title/ownership changed from you to the bank, which can now do with those dollars whatever it wants. With bailment, the bank is simply storing for you an asset you placed with them for storage. There was no change in title. The asset continues to be owned by you. So if there were physical gold in GLD, the above statement should be changed to "Proceeds received by the Trust from the issuance and sale of Baskets consist of gold bailments and, possibly from time to time, cash."

My point is that "gold" is one thing and a "gold deposit" is something entirely different. "Gold" is physical metal stored/bailed in a secure vault. A "gold deposit" is a liability of a financial institution. The former is a tangible asset (physical gold). The latter is a financial asset (paper gold). In summary, the GLD prospectus is full of legal loopholes. While GLD may in fact hold some physical gold, there is enough uncertainty with it that it seems clear much/most of GLD is paper. Otherwise, why doesn't GLD audit the gold to prove that it exists?

As shown by Mr. Turk, the Sponsor of GLD has chosen to structure the Trust using language which would permit the Trust to purchase gold and immediately lease out that gold. The lease receivable document would then satisfy a strict legal interpretation of the use of the term “gold deposits” by the Prospectus. A lease receivable document has risks embedded in it which further increase the inherent derivatives risk of GLD. A lease receivable document is NOT physical gold.

As for the annual auditor's report, found on pages 70-71 of the most recent GLD 10K filed 11/25/08, the auditor clearly states that their “responsibility is to express an opinion on the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.” As shown above, the internal controls rely on a tenuous chain of accountability from the Trustee down to the subcustodian's subcustodians, with almost no legal means to independently verify the existence of physical gold in the vaults used to store GLD gold. The auditor of GLD is neither required nor, in the case of access to subcustodian vaults, allowed to perform an actual physical accounting of the gold reported to be held on behalf of GLD by the Custodian. Ultimately, the auditor certifies its accounting for GLD based on financial reports from the Custodian and subcustodians which could ultimately be based on lease receivables rather than actual physical gold.

As can thus be seen by the risky legal structure and superficial auditing of GLD, and the willingness of the Governmental regulatory agencies to look the other way, anyone investing in GLD is taking on the risk of being victimized by the misleading financial and accounting schemes that have deeply infected the U.S. financial system. I would be quite surprised if any of the vast majority of institutional and retail investors, or their highly compensated advisors, are even remotely aware of the acute risks embedded in the GLD Trust. Make no mistake about it, investing in GLD is completely different than investing in actual physical gold. GLD does not even accurately index the price of physical gold, as the premiums on physical gold products like bullion coins have expanded from 10% to 40% above the spot price of gold over the last five years. This premium is not reflected in the price of GLD. If you invest in GLD now, with the intent of selling GLD in the future and buying physical gold, you will discover that your investment proceeds from GLD will purchase substantially less gold than was represented by your paper investment in GLD.

I have no problem with the concept of using GLD for daytrading to make directional bets, long or short, on the short term swings in the price of gold. But if you invest in GLD with the intent of making a long term investment in gold, please be aware that GLD is NOT an investment in actual physical gold. GLD is nothing more than a piece of paper which proclaims, but does not promise, to have gold on the other side of its highly structured legal barriers. Furthermore, for the reasons shown above, there is the possibility that you might wake up one day to find out that the price of GLD has suddenly dropped well below the spot price of gold and that GLD could even end up worthless.

If you don't trust GOLD,the only asset with a 6000 year track record, do you trust the logic of taking a $1,000 pine tree, cutting it up, turning it to pulp, putting some ink on it, and then calling it one billion $ dollars?
[verwijderd]
0
IMF may no longer need to sell its gold
The IMF does well in difficult times for the global economy as its income to meet its internal budgets arises from loans to nations in economic difficulties. In such times IMF loans increase, as does its income, which could mean there is not such a pressing need for the Fund to sell its gold says London's VM Group.
Author: Lawrence Williams Posted: Wednesday , 11 Feb 2009
LONDON -
Some two years ago the gold price was hit, albeit temporarily, by the announcement that the International Monetary Fund would sell 403 tonnes of gold as the basis of an endowment, the interest on which would be used to help defray the shortfall in the IMF budget. Indeed, at the time the Fund was suffering as its loan book was shrinking, eventually falling to SDR5.8bn at the end of the first quarter of 2008. The IMF does well when the world economy does badly, but conversely does badly when the world economy does well and at that time the global economy seemed to be riding high.
The reason the IMF does badly when the world economy does well is a simple one. The Fund relies on income from the loans it puts out to countries in economic difficulties for its day to day running expenses. When the Global economy is strong, countries can repay these loans and there are few takers for new ones, so income shrinks. After several years of strong global growth the Fund's loan book had shrunk - hence the need for the new source of funding recommended by the IMF's Committee of Eminent Persons to Study Sustainable Long Term Financing of IMF Running Costs, chaired by Sir Andrew Crockett, former head of The Bank for International Settlements (BIS). This is the Committee which recommended the sale of IMF gold reserves, the interest on the revenue from which could be used to plug the Fund's own internal budget deficit.
But, since the middle of last year the global economy has been in virtual freefall and the IMF has again been called upon by a number of countries to help prop up their economies with major loans. From the low of SDR5.8bn noted above, at the latest count the IMF now has loans out totalling $17.8 bn - and this figure is much more likely to rise than fall for the foreseeable future. Indeed it may well double or more.
In a briefing to clients from London's VM Group, the Group's analysts suggest that, with the increase in income currently being generated, the IMF no longer has a short term need to boost its income in other forms - such as with interest from the proceeds of a gold sales programme - and there will be certainly less urgency to implement such a programme.
Notwithstanding the IMF's improved internal funding circumstances the VM Group believes though, that "the Fund would still like to sell, largely because the Crockett Committee pinpointed some structural problems in the way the IMF financed itself. The Committee criticised the IMF's funding strategy, not just on the ground that it no longer covered its expenditure, but because it was too concentrated, wasn't related to its expenditure (in that other functions were covered by unrelated interest income), and - crucially - that it lacked predictability, soaring in bad times and falling in good times."
But - and the VM group reckons this is an important ‘but' - "..the Fund is not the only interested party in the question of IMF gold sales. It was always considered the US's share of IMF votes, has an effective veto. In the past, Congress has been against gold sales, not just because of the impact on the gold price (and gold-mining in the US and elsewhere), something the Committee was at pains to say would be minimised, but also through general unease about funding commitments to international financial institutions. Some US legislators will certainly pose the question .... now that the IMF's income is much better, does it really need to sell any gold? Moreover, the Fund might possibly have too much money after the financing reforms, if its loans were to continue to increase."
This is obviously a speculative assessment, but not one without merit. A major improvement in IMF finances may well lead to a ‘no sale' directive by the US Congress given that there will likely be many in the legislature uncertain of the impact of such sales on an already very fragile economic system. Leave well alone may be their feeling if the IMF is seen to be fully self funding again.

If you don't trust GOLD,the only asset with a 6000 year track record, do you trust the logic of taking a $1,000 pine tree, cutting it up, turning it to pulp, putting some ink on it, and then calling it one billion $ dollars?
459 Posts, Pagina: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 19 20 21 22 23 » | Laatste
Aantal posts per pagina:  20 50 100 | Omhoog ↑

Meedoen aan de discussie?

Word nu gratis lid of log in met uw e-mailadres en wachtwoord.

Direct naar Forum

Markt vandaag

 AEX
927,87  +3,77  +0,41%  09:57
 Germany40^ 21.823,00 +0,17%
 BEL 20 4.337,00 -0,02%
 Europe50^ 5.337,15 +0,22%
 US30^ 44.400,10 +0,13%
 Nasd100^ 21.604,60 +0,45%
 US500^ 6.048,83 +0,31%
 Japan225^ 38.868,20 +1,21%
 Gold spot 2.896,79 +1,26%
 EUR/USD 1,0322 +0,30%
 WTI 71,44 +0,69%
#/^ Index indications calculated real time, zie disclaimer

Stijgers

NX FILTRATION +5,94%
Sif Holding +2,50%
BAM +2,16%
PROSUS +1,92%
HEIJMANS KON +1,90%

Dalers

Basic-Fit -2,66%
ArcelorMittal -2,56%
AMG Critical ... -2,00%
Aperam -1,79%
PostNL -1,16%

EU stocks, real time, by Cboe Europe Ltd.; Other, Euronext & US stocks by NYSE & Cboe BZX Exchange, 15 min. delayed
#/^ Index indications calculated real time, zie disclaimer, streaming powered by: Infront