Koffiekamer « Terug naar discussie overzicht

In gold we trust

459 Posts, Pagina: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 19 20 21 22 23 » | Laatste
[verwijderd]
0
Capitalism Needs a Sound-Money Foundation
Let's give the Fed some competition. Abolish legal tender laws and see whose money people trust. By JUDY SHELTON

Let's go back to the gold standard.

If the very idea seems at odds with what is currently happening in our country -- with Congress preparing to pass a massive economic stimulus bill that will push the fiscal deficit to triple the size of last year's record budget gap -- it's because a gold standard stands in the way of runaway government spending.

Under a gold standard, if people think the paper money printed by government is losing value, they have the right to switch to gold. Fiat money -- i.e., currency with no intrinsic worth that government has decreed legal tender -- loses its value when government creates more than can be absorbed by the productive real economy. Too much fiat money results in inflation -- which pools in certain sectors at first, such as housing or financial assets, but ultimately raises prices in general.

Inflation is the enemy of capitalism, chiseling away at the foundation of free markets and the laws of supply and demand. It distorts price signals, making retailers look like profiteers and deceiving workers into thinking their wages have gone up. It pushes families into higher income tax brackets without increasing their real consumption opportunities.

In short, inflation undermines capitalism by destroying the rationale for dedicating a portion of today's earnings to savings. Accumulated savings provide the capital that finances projects that generate higher future returns; it's how an economy grows, how a society reaches higher levels of prosperity. But inflation makes suckers out of savers.

If capitalism is to be preserved, it can't be through the con game of diluting the value of money. People see through such tactics; they recognize the signs of impending inflation. When we see Congress getting ready to pay for 40% of 2009 federal budget expenditures with money created from thin air, there's no getting around it. Our money will lose its capacity to serve as an honest measure, a meaningful unit of account. Our paper currency cannot provide a reliable store of value.

So we must first establish a sound foundation for capitalism by permitting people to use a form of money they trust. Gold and silver have traditionally served as currencies -- and for good reason. A study by two economists at the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Arthur Rolnick and Warren Weber, concluded that gold and silver standards consistently outperform fiat standards. Analyzing data over many decades for a large sample of countries, they found that "every country in our sample experienced a higher rate of inflation in the period during which it was operating under a fiat standard than in the period during which it was operating under a commodity standard."

Given that the driving force of free-market capitalism is competition, it stands to reason that the best way to improve money is through currency competition. Individuals should be able to choose whether they wish to carry out their personal economic transactions using the paper currency offered by the government, or to conduct their affairs using voluntary private contracts linked to payment in gold or silver.

Legal tender laws currently favor government-issued money, putting private contracts in gold or silver at a distinct disadvantage. Contracts denominated in Federal Reserve notes are enforced by the courts, whereas contracts denominated in gold are not. Gold purchases are subject to taxes, both sales and capital gains. And while the Constitution specifies that only commodity standards are lawful -- "No state shall coin money, emit bills of credit, or make anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts" (Art. I, Sec. 10) -- it is fiat money that enjoys legal tender status and its protections.

Now is the time to challenge the exclusive monopoly of Federal Reserve notes as currency. Buyers and sellers, by mutual consent, should have access to an alternate means for settling accounts; they should be able to do business using a monetary unit of account defined in terms of gold. The existence of parallel currencies operating side-by-side on an equal legal footing would make it clear whether people had more confidence in fiat money or money redeemable in gold. If the gold-based system is preferred, it means that people fully understand that the purpose of money is to facilitate commerce, not to camouflage fiscal mismanagement.

Private gold currencies have served as the medium of exchange throughout history -- long before kings and governments took over the franchise. The initial justification for government involvement in money was to certify the weight and fineness of private gold coins. That rulers found it all too tempting to debase the money and defraud its users testifies more to the corruptive aspects of sovereign authority than to the viability of gold-based money.

Which is why government officials should not now have the last word in determining the monetary measure, especially when they have abused the privilege.

The same values that will help America regain its economic footing and get back on the path to productive growth -- honesty, reliability, accountability -- should be reflected in our money. Economists who promote the government-knows-best approach of Keynesian economics fail to comprehend the damaging consequences of spurring economic activity through a money illusion. Fiscal "stimulus" at the expense of monetary stability may accommodate the principles of the childless British economist who famously quipped, "In the long run, we're all dead." But it shortchanges future generations by saddling them with undeserved debt obligations.

There is also the argument that gold-linked money deprives the government of needed "flexibility" and could lead to falling prices. But contrary to fears of harmful deflation, the big problem is not that nominal prices might go down as production declines, but rather that dollar prices artificially pumped up by government deficit spending merely paper over the real economic situation. When the output of goods grows faster than the stock of money, benign deflation can occur -- it happened from 1880 to 1900 while the U.S. was on a gold standard. But the total price-level decline was 10% stretched over 20 years. Meanwhile, the gross domestic product more than doubled.

At a moment when the world is questioning the virtues of democratic capitalism, our nation should provide global leadership by focusing on the need for monetary integrity. One of the most serious threats to global economic recovery -- aside from inadequate savings -- is protectionism. An important benefit of developing a parallel currency linked to gold is that other countries could likewise permit their own citizens to utilize it. To the extent they did so, a common currency area would be created not subject to the insidious protectionism of sliding exchange rates.

The fiasco of the G-20 meeting in Washington last November -- it was supposed to usher in "the next Bretton Woods" -- suggests that any move toward a new international monetary system based on gold will more likely take place through the grass-roots efforts of Americans. It may already be happening at the state level. Last month, Indiana state Sen. Greg Walker introduced a bill -- "The Indiana Honest Money Act" -- which
[verwijderd]
0
The fiasco of the G-20 meeting in Washington last November -- it was supposed to usher in "the next Bretton Woods" -- suggests that any move toward a new international monetary system based on gold will more likely take place through the grass-roots efforts of Americans. It may already be happening at the state level. Last month, Indiana state Sen. Greg Walker introduced a bill -- "The Indiana Honest Money Act" -- which would, if enacted, allow citizens the option of paying in or receiving back gold, silver or the equivalent electronic receipt as an alternative to Federal Reserve notes for all transactions conducted with the state of Indiana.

It may turn out to be a bellwether. Certainly, it's a sign of a growing feeling in the heartland that we need to go back to sound money. We need money that works for the legitimate producers and consumers of the world -- the savers and borrowers, the entrepreneurs. Not money that works for the chiselers.

Ms. Shelton, an economist, is author of "Money Meltdown: Restoring Order to the Global Currency System" (Free Press, 1994).

If you don't trust GOLD,the only asset with a 6000 year track record, do you trust the logic of taking a $1,000 pine tree, cutting it up, turning it to pulp, putting some ink on it, and then calling it one billion $ dollars?
[verwijderd]
0
Is gold the only salvation from this financial Armageddon? Indications are that the global financial situation could yet get far worse before it starts getting better - particularly in Europe - and gold may again prove to be the only real way of protecting wealth in a continuing global financial meltdown. Author: Lawrence Williams Posted: Monday , 16 Feb 2009 LONDON
"It ain't over 'til its over" is one of the best known quotations from baseball catcher and coach Yogi Berra and as the global financial crisis unwinds it is very apposite yet again. We ain't anywhere near the end yet and possibly the worst is yet to come as far as European banks in particular are concerned. Markets have breathed sighs of relief as various banks have been bailed out and stimulation packages are being approved if not already implemented.
But, one gets the feeling that any relief is premature. The debt situation in a huge number of debtor nations - virtually the whole of Eastern Europe falls into this category - is dire and has not really yet fallen into the sights of the investment world - but bankers must be quaking in their shoes as surely they are aware of the potential financial Armageddon that still lies ahead.
And this time it is the already shaky Western European banking sector that is most at risk. US Banks, accused of starting this all, maybe far less vulnerable to the times ahead. True the US financial sector may have got us into this mess, but European bankers followed suit and, in the event, may be shown to have behaved far more recklessly than their American counterparts. It would seem that some of the potential shortfalls being faced would be beyond the financial ability of Central Banks, Governments and transnational agencies like the IMF to sort out. The system is like a house of cards. One major failure could bring the whole house tumbling down.
This is the kind of situation that leads to global nightmares - wars even. Radical extremists get elected to positions of power - as with the rise of National Socialism in Germany after the crash of the Weimar Republic with its hyperinflation. We could be in for a very sticky time ahead as the real implications, and depth, of the financial meltdown catch up with us.
The problems ahead may not be beyond the wit of man to devise a solution which can 'save the world', but that is unlikely to come from UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown who appears to have laid claim to this cachet in a freudian moment of rhetorical madness. Don't forget this is the same Gordon Brown who decimated the UK's gold reserves by selling half of them off (395 tonnes) at gold's low points from 1999-2002 - amounting to some $12bn at today's prices - a sum the UK treasury would give its eye teeth for in the current financial crisis, although this is small beer relative to the sums squandered by the UK banks. But it is an indicator of Gordon Brown's acumen, or lack of it, in dealing with global financial trends. Indeed Gordon Brown's thinking is probably echoed by many others in the European and perhaps the US financial hierarchy which doesn't bode well for any rescue package that will actually work to stem the flow of toxic debt which has built up all around the world and may almost certainly amount in total to a greater sum than all the world's financial reserves combined, But then that is the nature of banking. It only takes a run on almost any bank to bring the whole institution crashing down, and to allow any country to fail - and there are signs that the European Central Bankers may let some Eastern European states go under, thus triggering a domino effect of defaults worldwide, to bring the world banking system to its knees - or worse. There are even fears that past high flyers like the Irish Republic could be forced to default on its debts, and undoubtedly the situation for, say, the Baltic states is far worse still. What solution is there out there. Printing money on an unprecedented scale will expose the world to huge inflationary pressures for years to come, but this may be the only way forward using more conventional solutions. Perhaps a huge revaluation in the price of gold could help bolster some treasuries and bring some confidence back into the system. And, as with any bank run it is confidence which is needed to stem the tide, not necessarily actual money!
But where does all this leave the investor? Not in a happy position. The logic of further financial collapses and bank failures would be to knock the markets down and down, which in turn takes wealth out of the system and decimates pensions upon which an increasingly aging society is dependent. Buy gold may be an answer to protect oneself, but as we saw last year, gold too can be vulnerable as in times of reduced liquidity funds and individuals have to sell any liquid assets to cover their positions. But then gold is probably not as vulnerable as other assets - again as we have seen over the past year. Those who were invested in gold at the beginning of 2008, for example, and did not sell during the year, at least maintained the value of their holdings while virtually all other investment options crashed, although this was not true of most gold stocks.
Now we are seeing professional and institutional investors moving into gold in a big way just to try and protect their, and their clients' wealth. As we have pointed out here frequently, gold ETFs are seeing an unprecedented inflow of funds, although there are those out there who would say it is better to hold physical gold than any form of paper gold because of a growing distrust of financial institutions and paper solutions. And perhaps rather gold than other precious metals - notably silver. Silver would be sure to be dragged up on gold's coattails, but perhaps not as much this time - even though history tells us that silver's volatility leads it to perform better than gold in percentage terms on the upside and worse on the downside. We are in a different situation with silver not really a monetary metal any longer. Industrial demand pressures on silver may well mitigate any price rises here. Gold's performance, though, is perhaps also dependent on investment demand outstripping a fall off in the jewellery market and an increase in liquidation of such holdings into the scrap sector. If the big Asian economies like India and China, where mark-ups on gold jewellery are minuscule compared with the West, falter significantly then reduced demand and increased supply from this sector will need to be soaked up by the investment sector. At the moment this seems to be capable of doing this hence the recent gold price strength, but unless sentiment changes in India in particular, where buyers seem to be waiting for lower prices, the fall in gold purchases there may limit global gold price growth. If liquidity becomes a problem in the North American markets again, this could also dent upward movement. But overall, physical gold, gold ETFs and selected gold stocks would seem to be the best wealth protectors out there. As commentators have pointed out, prices may remain relatively volatile, but currently the overall price trend tends to be upwards movement, followed by stabilisation, before the next upwards resistance levels are tested. Gold does look to be steadily climbing back towards the psychological $1,000 an ounce level but it has had trouble sustaining increases beyond this level in the past
[verwijderd]
0
February 16, 2009
In times of crisis, never forget the value of gold
The dollar is simply a piece of paper. Gold is a much better store of value and is the best insurance against future shocks
William Rees-Mogg

Last week was a bad one for bank shares; after the HBOS £8.5 billion loss, Lloyds shares fell by a third and other bank shares fell as well. Yet it was a very good week for the gold price, which closed on Friday at $935 an ounce, after reaching what was nearly a seven-month high of $953.30 on Wednesday.

Barclays Capital commented that gold prices were resuming their long-run bull trend after eight consecutive years of gains. For longer than the past eight years I have been arguing that investment in gold is an essential insurance against financial shocks. Last week was a classic example. Respectable British bank shares have now fallen by up to 90 per cent, while the gold price has risen by more than 200 per cent since Gordon Brown began selling the Bank of England's gold reserve.

I have been following the gold price since I published The Reigning Error, a short book on inflation, in 1974. I have not consistently advised people to buy gold - like all other assets, gold can become significantly overvalued, as it did in 1980. However, I have found that the movements of the gold price are one of the most useful pieces of evidence about the health of the world economy. Mr Brown's sale of gold was an avoidable error. My friend the MP Peter Tapsell repeatedly warned him in Parliament not to do it.

People buy gold when they are nervous about the economy, and they are right to do so because gold is a unique commodity. It has to a high degree two qualities that are seldom found together: liquidity and reality. It has strong liquidity; it can almost always be bought, sold or exchanged. There are other liquid assets, of which the US dollar is probably supreme, but they lack gold's quality of real value.

Dollars do not constitute a real asset, such as property or “real estate”. The dollar is simply a piece of paper. Gold has been a much better store of value than the dollar.

In 1873 one of the leading British economists, William Stanley Jevons, published a short book, Money and the Mechanism of Exchange. By 1887 it had reached its eighth edition. Unfortunately, there are few modern economists who do not suffer from the delusion that new truths make old ones obsolete.

Great mistakes could have been avoided in 2008 if bankers and politicians had studied Jevons, even though his little book was written 136 years ago. Jevons quotes Herbert Spencer as observing that “it is the grave misfortune of the moral and political sciences that they are continually discussed by those who have never laboured at the elementary grammar or the simple arithmetic of the subject”. That was true then, and it is true now. Indeed, there are still some people who believe that poverty can be abolished by the issue of printed bits of paper.

Nowadays such people usually call themselves Keynesians, though their doctrine is not to be found in the works of Maynard Keynes, a much less simplistic economist than some of his modern followers. These so-called neo-Keynesians are hostile to gold, usually for two reasons. They see gold as the natural enemy of the paper money in which they put their trust; they see gold-related systems as imposing a discipline on the unlimited issue of paper money, and they reject that.

World trade depends on the existing global system, which is one of paper currencies, separately managed and largely unconvertible. These currencies float in terms of each other, sometimes with a fixed rate in relation to a larger currency. Since President Nixon closed the gold window in 1971, there has been no fixed-rate convertibility between any of these paper currencies and gold. In the past 40 years the world exchange system has suffered from two periods of high inflation and is now suffering from the worst depression since the 1930s.

In 1873 Jevons could already write: “It is hardly requisite to tell again the well-worn tale of the over-issue of paper money which has almost always followed the removal of the legal necessity of convertibility. Hardly any civilised nation exists, which has not suffered from the scourge of paper money at one time or another... Time after time in the earlier history of New England and some of the other states now forming part of the American Union, paper money had been issued and had brought ruin.”

Daniel Webster's opinion should never be forgotten. Of paper money he says: “We have suffered more from this cause than from every other cause or calamity. It has killed more men, pervaded and corrupted the choicest interests of our country more, and done more injustice than even the arms and artifices of our enemy.”

In the 1930s some nations tried to beat the slump by competitive devaluations. In the present crisis, Britain has already experienced a very big devaluation of the pound, taking it down by a quarter against the dollar. Every country, led by the United States, has been issuing money, often in very large amounts, in order to bail out its banks. No one knows the total value of these national injections of cash into the banking systems. As the earlier injections have not restored stability to national economies, further injections inevitably will be made. All will be made in unconvertible currency, and overissue will occur.

Sooner or later the world's governments will have to reconsider Keynes's two real achievements, Britain's low inflation finance of the Second World War, and the world currency system that he negotiated at Bretton Woods.

Both Jevons and Keynes believed in the need for what Jevons called “a worldwide system of international money”. Without it, recurrent crises, such as the present one, will be inevitable. Governments need to create a new world system, in which gold, as a stabiliser, should play its part. For individuals, gold remains the best insurance against future shocks and the best store of value.

If you don't trust GOLD,the only asset with a 6000 year track record, do you trust the logic of taking a $1,000 pine tree, cutting it up, turning it to pulp, putting some ink on it, and then calling it one billion $ dollars?
[verwijderd]
0
Binnen een maand van $ 840 naar -vanmorgen- $ 961.

Het goud vloog vanmorgen in korte tijd naar Euro 24.500 per kilo!

Waar gaan we heen?

www.bullionvault.com/gold-price-chart.do
www.kitco.com/charts/livegold.html
Bijlage:
[verwijderd]
0
Thank Gold its friday
Intro:

De huidige generatie Centrale Bankiers denken slimmer te zijn dan markt....en denken dat ze de markt onder controle hebben. De illusie de business cycle onder controle te hebben wordt op dit moment snoeihard afgestraft door Goud, maar ook door de instortende economie.

Volledige analyse:
---------------------------------------------------

Thank Gold its friday

Goud blijft als gevolg van de puinhopen overal nieuwe highs neerzetten, en Zilver doet vrolijk mee. Het is een belangrijk gegeven, dat Goud zeer goed reageert op onze instortende economie. De monetaire geschiedenis maakt 1 ding duidelijk, er is uiteindelijk maar 1 iets dat altijd weer terugkomt, en dat is Goud. Het is ook niet gebonden aan een regio...overal ter wereld kan je dit gele waardeloze goedje inruilen. Het blijft natuurlijk opmerkelijk dat onze 'slimme' Centrale Bankiers (die er echt voor geleerd hebben), dit niet begrijpen. De huidige generatie Centrale Bankiers denken slimmer te zijn dan markt....en denken dat ze de markt onder controle hebben. De illusie de business cycle onder controle te hebben wordt op dit moment snoeihard afgestraft door Goud, maar ook door de instortende economie. De Banken, politici en de Centrale Banken zijn DE grote schuldigen, dus verwacht geen oplossingen van deze groep....alleen maar meer van hetzelfde. Obama kunnen we sinds kort aan dat rijtje toevoegen, en Rick Santelli van CNBC laat dat schitterend zien. Daarom dat ik ook de video met jullie wilde delen...de free market is verder weg dan ooit, terwijl de vrije markt uiteindelijk de enige oplossing is. De huidige generatie beleidsmakers denken nog steeds dat ze het beter weten, en lopen als gevolg daarvan per definitie achter de feiten aan. Het trieste is natuurlijk dat de internationale middenklasse de vernieling in wordt gedraaid op dit moment.

Hoe meer ik lees over het verleden, hoe meer 1 ding duidelijk wordt....geld is er genoeg & Goud is en blijft schaars (net als Zilver). De geldkraan gaat men verder en verder opendraaien (zie bericht van Bernanke van gisteren), met de illusie dat je welvaart/koopkracht en groei kan maken met de drukpers.

We zien vandaag dat de beurzen opnieuw onder druk komen te staan, en dat de kans dat ING het gaat halen minimaal aan het worden is. Was het deze of vorige week, dat minister Bos aangaf dat de banken gered waren, en de burgers nu aan de beurt zijn. Met het mogelijk inzetten van een nieuw hoofdstuk in deze tragedie, kan er van alles gaan gebeuren. Sociale onrust lijkt me op de korte termijn de meest waarschijnlijke. Natuurlijk kunnen we een handelsoorlog (als gevolg van protectie om de banen te redden), niet uitsluiten. Alles is mogelijk hier, maar leuk is het allemaal niet. Een nieuwe golf van dalingen voor de beurzen kan echte paniek veroorzaken......nog meer?

Stay safe all in deze krankzinnige tijden.....

Goud US$996 ( Eur 790) & Zilver US$14.51 (new highs)

Got Gold?
mihaly

edelmetaalplaza.com/web_redactie.asp?...

If you don't trust GOLD,the only asset with a 6000 year track record, do you trust the logic of taking a $1,000 pine tree, cutting it up, turning it to pulp, putting some ink on it, and then calling it one billion $ dollars?

[verwijderd]
0
Deze video is een aanrader en zeer toegankelijk voor iedereen niet nog niet helemaal begrijpt hoe de wereld in deze misere verzeild is geraakt.
Waarschuwing NIET geschikt voor MARXISTEN en NWO collaborateurs!

Money, Banking and the Federal Reserve
Intro:


Een schitterend overzicht van de monetaire geschiedenis van de VS door Mises. Echt een aanrader!

edelmetaalplaza.com/web_redactie.asp?...

If you don't trust GOLD,the only asset with a 6000 year track record, do you trust the logic of taking a $1,000 pine tree, cutting it up, turning it to pulp, putting some ink on it, and then calling it one billion $ dollars?
[verwijderd]
1
Gung Ho schrijft;.....nieuwe highs neerzetten, en Zilver doet vrolijk mee.....

Howdy,

Zilver doet vrolijk mee?

Zilver is nu slechts zo'n 60-65% van de high van 2008

Al vele jaren schrijft GH: "silver, not if ?, but when"

maar in de reele wereld is het nog steeds andersom; "silver, not when, but if ?"

>--:-)-->

p.s. Zilver is ook 'n industrieel metaal, en in de huidige malaise valt de vraag naar zilver
[verwijderd]
0
Silver; Past, Present, Future Theodore Butler's Speech at the
Phoenix Silver Summit 2009

Good afternoon and thank you for being here. It's an honor to get to speak with so many interested in silver, especially at such an interesting time in history. I'm going to ramble a bit, and try not to get too detailed and save some time for questions where you can get specific.
I'd like to acknowledge a few people who are not here that had an awful lot to do with me being here today. First, I'd like to thank Jim Cook, from Investment Rarities in Minneapolis, for his sponsorship of my work for more than eight years. It was this support that enabled me to devote all my time to studying and contemplating everything I could about silver. Thanks, Jim.

Second, I'd like to thank my friend of 25+ years, Israel Friedman. It was Izzy, who back in 1984, issued to me the challenge to prove him wrong in his analysis of silver. Although I had traded and invested in silver for years before his challenge, I admit to never having studied it in depth. Izzy's claim that the world was and had been consuming more silver than was being produced seemed so at odds with the price at that time, that I took up his challenge. I also admit that I thought it would be easy to prove him wrong, although I was well aware of his buying of silver in the $4 range and then selling it in the $40 range a few years later. When I discovered that he was correct, it set off a thought process that I couldn't satisfy. I couldn't reconcile how there could be greater demand for an item than there was current production with prices not moving higher. I'm sure that many had also been deeply perplexed with that puzzle.

For some reason, rather than to simply dismiss and put out of mind something I couldn't figure out, I thought long and hard about the silver supply/demand/pricing enigma. It was that thought process, plus my background as a commodity broker, that led me to the conclusion that the silver market was manipulated by excessive short selling on the COMEX. The actual Eureka Moment came one day as I reading the Wall Street Journal Commodity Tables. It wasn't an accidental discovery. I was looking for something wrong. I was looking for anything that was different about silver that could account for it's very different behavior compared to other commodities. After all, we were all taught that when consumption is greater than production, price must rise. Yet silver didn't. The light bulb went off in my head when I realized that COMEX open interest, when converted into real world supplies was completely out of line with every other commodity. This meant that the derivatives market in silver was larger than the underlying host market from which it was derived. A complete absurdity. The paper market tail was wagging the physical market dog. This is something that has remained constant in the subsequent 25 years of manipulation.

Much later, I would come to understand the role of leasing in the silver manipulation, which answered a lot of open questions in my mind. It was Izzy who caused me to be bitten by the silver bug, just as I may have, in turn, infected others, who in turn infected still more. The good news about this silver virus is that instead of giving you the flu or killing you, it could make you rich. For introducing me to silver, thanks Izzy

Finally, I'd like to thank my wife, Mila, who has been subjected to my preoccupation of silver for the entire duration. While I have both suffered along the way and enjoyed the journey, it was always my choice to continue or not. I know it was much harder for Mila as a partner, and a I marvel at her ability to persevere where I know I could not, were our roles reversed. Thanks Mila.

The Past The silver story goes back, quite literally, for thousands of years. You won't find many stories of longer duration, except if you're an archeologist. For those thousands of years, it was prized as money and jewelry and for ornamental objects and as a measurement of wealth. Silver's history is similar to its precious metals brother, gold. Both precious metals were the cause of exploration and the discovery of new worlds, and instrumental in the development and formation of nations, including war. Both gold and silver were dug out of the ground and held and accumulated throughout the ages. For use as money, governments for hundreds of years assigned a fixed ratio of roughly 15 to 16 ounces of silver being worth one ounce of gold. This made sense, because that ratio was close to the rate at which silver came out of the ground compared to gold. There was a lot more silver accumulated above ground than gold, so it further made sense that 16 ounces of silver was equal to one ounce of gold. In the late 1800's tremendous new silver production came to market, due to the massive supplies from the Comstock Load in the western US. Coupled with a demonetarization of silver, but not gold, by many world governments the price of silver plummeted and with that the amount of silver needed to buy one ounce of gold rose to 100 ounces in the 1920's. The world was truly awash in silver.

Coincident with these developments, starting about 100 to 150 years ago, around the same time that the world found itself awash in silver, something else dramatic was occurring. We began to enter the industrial age. Inventions and devices of all kinds began to be introduced, impacting the world as never before. Electricity came into wide use. The automobile was born. Photography was introduced. As dramatic as this overall change was to how people lived, the transformation in silver was even more dramatic. It turned out that the substance that the world was awash in, the substance that had been accumulated for thousands of years, had properties that no one could have contemplated through the vast sweep of history. This largely too abundant material was a perfect fit for the rapidly transforming modern and industrial world. Silver was, and is, the best conductor of electricity, the best heat transfer agent, the best reflector of light, a marvelous lubricant, a versatile catalyst and alloy for a wide range of industrial applications, including medical. Silver was the key ingredient that made photography possible. All these uses, plus abundant supply and cheap prices. It was the perfect consumption set up. And consuming silver is something the world took to in a very big way, until this very day.

It was the push into the modern age that caused a parting of the ways between silver and gold in how they were used. Gold has many potential industrial applications, although not near as many as silver. But because gold was, and is, so high-priced compared to silver, it wasn't practical to use it in widespread industrial applications. Because silver was so cheap and abundant, it was used extensively. So extensively, that not only did the world begin to consume every ounce of silver that was taken from the ground, it also began to consume the accumulated inventory from the past.

In 1940, there were approximately 10 billion ounces of silver above ground in the world, with half owned by the US Government. At that time, there was about a billion ounces of gold. Ten times more silver existed in the world than gold. After more than 60 years of over-consumption of silver, of drawing down and depleting the inventories built up over hundreds and even thousands of years, the relationship of how much silver exists
[verwijderd]
0
After more than 60 years of over-consumption of silver, of drawing down and depleting the inventories built up over hundreds and even thousands of years, the relationship of how much silver exists above ground compared to gold has flipped. Now there is much more gold left in the world than silver. Currently there are up to 5 times more gold in the world than silver, depending on how you define inventory. Silver inventories have declined from 10 billion ounces in 1940 to 1 billion today. The U.S. government, the largest owner of silver in 1940, with over 5 billion ounces, now owns zero ounces. Gold world inventories, including jewelry, have increased from 1 billion ounces in 1940 to 5 billion today, according to all reputable sources like the World Gold Council.

I ask you to think about that for a moment, there being more gold than silver aboveground, as this is one of the most important factors in silver today. It is also one of the least known facts, even though it is easily verifiable and has evolved over such a long time. When people first hear or read it, they instinctively disbelieve it. 99.9% of the people on the planet, to this day, would tell you that it can't possibly be true that there is more gold than silver in the world. Or even that there is an equal amount of gold and silver. None of this 99.9% has ever taken even a minute to think about it or read or try to verify how much of each remains above ground. They don't have to. Their verification comes everyday, as it has everyday for decades, from one simple source - the daily price of each. The price of silver and gold is broadcast constantly, to every nook and cranny around the world, that there are 60 to 70 to 80 times more silver in the world than there is gold. That's what 99.9% of the people in the world think. And I'm not just talking about uneducated people in third world countries. I would include the most sophisticated, wealthy and educated people, who have come to believe that the price doesn't lie. I do hope 99% of the people here don't think that.

It is this simple fact, that the relative price of silver compared to gold is so distorted, relative the their respective quantities in existence, that is all anyone needs to know to buy silver. This is not a knock on gold. I will stipulate to and accept as true every bullish argument that anyone could make on gold. You could spend hours or days lecturing me on all the good things that gold has going for it, and I will accept them without dissent. When you are done giving all the bullish gold arguments, I would just add two things. One, all those arguments apply to silver as well, and two, there is less silver than gold.

I'm compressing hundreds and even thousands of years of silver history into a few minutes of time. For many centuries, the world dug up and used silver for money and beauty and wealth. In the last century or so, we discovered incredible new uses for this age-old material and continued to dig it out of the ground, in ever increasing quantities, basically consuming all the newly mined silver plus almost all of the old stuff as well. And even though this is a fairly easy set of facts to verify, only an infinitesimal amount of people are aware of how little silver remains. And in spite of the growing rarity of this age-old cherished and desired material, its price, on any objective measure, is dirt cheap. There is less silver in the world on a per capita basis, than in history, yet the price still reflects super abundance. At the risk of over using a statement I've made in the past, I couldn't make this up if I tried.

The Present

I'm going to include the 5 years or so, maybe even a little longer, as part of the present. Today, thanks to the Internet and other means of communication, including conferences like this, the true silver story is coming out. I think I've played some role in that. Investors, in ever growing numbers are grasping the disconnect between the price and the true value existing in silver. It is this disconnect that presents an exciting investment opportunity.

Perhaps the most unique and attractive characteristic about silver is its dual role as a vital industrial material and its history and desirability as an investment asset. No other commodity comes close to silver in this regard. Of course, we need copper and zinc and lead for industrial purposes, but they have never been considered popular investments in their pure metal state. Same with other natural resources, like oil. None of these commodities can be practically held in one's personal possession. Gold is the primary investment metal, but its high price prevents widespread industrial use. Platinum and palladium are both precious metals and are used extensively in industrial applications, but have not evolved into broad and popular investment assets.

As the true dual role material, silver stands alone. In its industrial consumption role, silver demand has been so strong for the past 60 years, that it has depleted inventories that took hundreds of years to accumulate. Now that industrial demand has been interrupted by current bleak economic circumstances, investment demand is stepping in to take up the slack. And make no mistake, the evidence clearly indicates that an investment rush is developing in silver.

The introduction of the silver and gold ETF's (Exchange Traded Funds) has been the single most important factor on the investment side of silver's dual role. Since the introduction of the first silver ETF, less than three years ago, over 300 million ounces have been absorbed by the various silver ETF's. That is remarkable and much more than I ever thought they could accumulate. More importantly, these ETF's will turn out to be, in my opinion, what my friend Carl Loeb has nicknamed, the Death Star, in that they may absorb all the world's available silver.

Lately, I've noticed quite a bit of suspicion and criticism concerning the legitimacy of the ETF's, particularly the gold ETF's, with the criticism centered on whether the real metal exists that is said to be on deposit. I'd like to add my two cents. Quite frankly, I don't understand this criticism. If someone would prefer to own metal in his own possession or control, they should do so. It's an easy choice. Certainly, this has always been my advice. And it's not like the ETF's are beyond criticism, and I have publicly done so in the past when I detected massive unreported short selling in the big silver ETF, SLV. I think that's fraud, and I think there is currently a big unreported short position in SLV.

But that's not what the current criticism of the gold ETF's is all about. The current criticism revolves around allegations that the metal said to be deposited is not really there, even though serial numbers and weights of all bars are listed. It seems some are claiming that the big quantities of gold flowing to the ETF's are beyond anything reasonable. Where can all this metal be coming from? While I can't personally guarantee the metal is in the ETF's, nor do I wish to, I don't understand this line of thinking. The gold ETF's have been accumulating gold for more than 4 years. In that time, roughly 50 million ounces have been absorbed by the all the gold ETF's. That's one percent of all the gold in the world. Even if you reduce the 5 billion ounce gold inventory by 60%, and say there is 2 billion ounces of gold in good-delivery bullion bar form, the 50 million ounces i
[verwijderd]
0
Even if you reduce the 5 billion ounce gold inventory by 60%, and say there is 2 billion ounces of gold in good-delivery bullion bar form, the 50 million ounces in gold ETF's is only 2.5% of that 2 billion ounces. Is it so hard to imagine 2.5% of anything being accumulated over 4 years and with more than a doubling in price? After all, the silver ETF's have accumulated almost 30% of total world bullion inventories and little is said of that by gold people.

The fact is, for the most part, the investors who buy the silver and gold ETF's are institutional investors who probably wouldn't buy the metal if the ETF's didn't exist. You would think the gold analysts criticizing the ETF's would recognize that. The buying in the silver and gold ETF's are a very big reason behind the doubling in price in a few years. You would think metal people would be cheering the ETF's on, instead of complaining. Go figure. Look, I understand that investment demand in mining shares has probably suffered as a result of buying in ETF's, but that's a different issue and is no reason to claim that the gold ETF's don't have the metal. Metals prices wouldn't have climbed if there was no metal demand from the ETF's.

Back to silver investment demand. Aside from ETF demand, the past year has seen other compelling evidence of an investment rush into silver. For the first time in any of our lifetimes, we have witnessed a persistent retail investment shortage, characterized by soaring premiums and delays in product delivery. I have to laugh when some people say there is no retail shortage, as the very definition of a shortage is rising premiums and delays in deliveries.

Also, we have witnessed, for twelve straight months, something never seen before. The US Mint, even after doubling its production capacity, hasn't been able to fully supply Silver Eagles in the quantities demanded, for the first time in the 23 year history of the program. There is no doubt in my mind that my friend Izzy is responsible for kicking off the rush into Silver Eagles with his article in December 2007. I know of no one else who recommended Silver Eagles, then or now.

The current economic collapse has resulted in a sharp drop in industrial consumption of all commodities, including silver. Production, while falling, has not yet fallen as much. It will, given silver's byproduct production profile. So, temporarily, we have a "surplus" of silver. Unlike other industrial materials, the surplus in silver is being gobbled up as an investment. Instead of being dumped into exchange warehouse inventories, like copper, zinc, or other industrial metals. Once production of all these metals falls sufficiently enough to balance with industrial consumption, as it must, there should be a shortage in silver that will seem unreal.

The economic condition of the world is dreadful. That it came like a thief in the night makes it more ominous. When and how we turn this around, I haven't a clue. Many of us have worried about this for 30 years or more, hoping it would never come. Despite that hope, the wolf has come to the door. We must deal with it. Fortunately for silver, these scary economic times rev up investment demand. The worse economic conditions become, the more silver investment demand should grow. Silver is positioned well for whatever economic conditions prevail.

The Future

I want you to do me a favor. I want you to play a little game of imagination with me. It may sound silly at first, but try to play along, as I want to make the central point of the day. I want you to imagine that in this room, right there, in the space between you and me, is a giant elephant. Not a regular elephant, mind you, but the biggest elephant ever documented. A 26,000 lbs African Bush Elephant, 14 feet tall in the shoulders, with absolutely massive tusks. I looked this up, so I'm not misstating the dimensions. Not only is this the biggest elephant ever recorded, it's loud, agitated and it stinks to high heaven, flapping its ears and swinging its giant trunk. And it's right there and has been right there the whole time. I want you to imagine that you've been sitting there, listening to me talk about silver with this 13 ton elephant right there, interrupting my speech all along and scaring the dickens out of you. And the kicker is that we're all trying our best to ignore the elephant. Pretending it's not there, speaking around it. We're all trying to act like it's perfectly normal to be in a room speaking about silver with this giant elephant and trying to act like it's not there, when it clearly is there.

The African Bush Elephant in the room is the silver manipulation. But whereas the elephant is imaginary, the silver manipulation is as real as rain. But like the imaginary elephant, most are doing their best to pretend that the silver manipulation doesn't exist. Not me, of course, as the manipulation is the most important pricing factor in silver, and I write on it continuously. I sense I have convinced many thousands of readers that silver is manipulated and maybe many in this room. But it is absolutely amazing to me how so few analysts and industry people publicly speak out on the manipulation.

I'm talking of people working for the financial firms and banks whose job it is to follow and write about silver. I'm speaking of those in the mining industry and in particular the Silver Institute. I'm not complaining about this lack of manipulation talk. Maybe at one time it upset me to be so alone, but not anymore. Now it's just amusing. I read everything there is to read on silver and 95% of what I read never refers to the manipulation in any way. I find that bizarre. I find that to be the real life equivalent to my previous imaginary exercise of the elephant and pretending it's not in the room.

I'm not demanding that anyone agree with me about silver being manipulated. I'm human and I reserve the right to be wrong. Besides, it's better for me to be the only making this the main issue. In the past, many did challenge and attempt to refute my allegations of manipulation, especially those in the mining industry, which never made much sense. But as the issue has become so specific as to the documented facts about the concentration, I'm not even hearing lately anyone explaining why I am wrong or answering simple questions, even on the Internet. If there is one thing I have learned about the Internet, because of its shield of anonymity, many love to tell you why you are wrong and they are right, and in generally a rude manner to boot. But I've asked the question for 6 months for how can one or two U.S. banks being short 25% of the world silver production not be manipulative, with no response. I was seriously considering running a contest with a reward for every legitimate answer.

Stranger still in the collective avoidance of even talking about a potential market manipulation is that the prime regulator, the CFTC, has initiated a formal investigation into my allegations of manipulation in silver. This is the third silver investigation in less than five years, and the first by their Enforcement Division. This has never occurred in any other commodity. Regardless of the outcome of the investigation, the fact that there is another investigation is extraordinary, in and of itself. Nothing could be a more important issue than whether any market is manipulated or free. You would think that there would be wide discussion on the potential
[verwijderd]
0
quote:

Amor Arrows schreef:

Gung Ho schrijft;.....nieuwe highs neerzetten, en Zilver doet vrolijk mee.....

Howdy,

Zilver doet vrolijk mee?

Zilver is nu slechts zo'n 60-65% van de high van 2008

Al vele jaren schrijft GH: "silver, not if ?, but when"

maar in de reele wereld is het nog steeds andersom; "silver, not when, but if ?"
Knokkelbergen en crematoria weleens aangedacht?

p.s. Zilver is ook 'n industrieel metaal, en in de huidige malaise valt de vraag naar zilver
[verwijderd]
0


Stranger still in the collective avoidance of even talking about a potential market manipulation is that the prime regulator, the CFTC, has initiated a formal investigation into my allegations of manipulation in silver. This is the third silver investigation in less than five years, and the first by their Enforcement Division. This has never occurred in any other commodity. Regardless of the outcome of the investigation, the fact that there is another investigation is extraordinary, in and of itself. Nothing could be a more important issue than whether any market is manipulated or free. You would think that there would be wide discussion on the potential outcome or the merits, pro and con, on the investigation itself. Instead, mum's the word. That so many establishment analysts and mining and industry people can pretend that everything has been completely aboveboard in silver is more bizarre than my elephant in the room example. Especially now that the CFTC has stated that they are investigating.

Like all manipulations, the silver manipulation has resulted in an artificial price level. Unlike most manipulations, the one in silver is a downward price manipulation. Admittedly, that does make it harder for folks to grasp the issue. But the saving grace to this manipulation is that those not involved in the manipulation can take advantage of the artificially depressed price. The special essence of this manipulation is that outsiders can profit from it in a simple and easy manner. All you have to do is buy and wait.

Like all manipulations, the silver manipulation will end suddenly and the price must move sharply in the opposite direction of the manipulation. In this case, the price of silver will explode upwards, once the manipulation is terminated. Those holding silver when that occurs will be rewarded. This is not complicated.

But what happens if the CFTC's investigation ends with them, once again, finding that no manipulation exists in silver? It doesn't matter. The silver manipulation must end, suddenly and violently, to the upside, no matter what the CFTC says or does. I wouldn't be no naïve as to depend on the CFTC for doing the right thing. The price, having been depressed so low and for so long, must result in a shortage. The shortage has been clearly evident in the retail market for more than a year. Not as clearly, but present nevertheless, are strong signs of a wholesale shortage in the unreported shorting of SLV shares and other wholesale indications. When this shortage hits in earnest, no one will be able to stop the sudden demise of the silver manipulation.

You might further ask, "If the manipulation in silver will end regardless of what the CFTC may or may not do, why do you (meaning me) persist in focusing on this issue? Why not just sit back and let it happen? Well, I have no choice in waiting to let it happen, so I guess the question is whether to keep quiet about it. The answer to that is while the manipulation presents the strongest reason for buying silver, it is a market crime of the highest order. There is no more serious market crime than manipulation. It is the equivalent to Murder One, Treason or kidnapping.

In addition to providing the most compelling reason for buying silver, the manipulation is a crime in progress. As such it offends my sense of what is right and wrong. Being the best reason for buying silver and being a crime in progress are not mutually exclusive. Just like recommending that people buy silver and write to the regulators and lawmakers complaining about the manipulation is mutually exclusive. And I am gratified that so many have taken the time to contact the regulators, as it has really made all the difference in the world.

In conclusion, the supply/demand set up in silver, which has evolved over an incredibly long period of time, has been one continuous process promising to culminate in an explosion in price at some point. Quite simply, we are rapidly approaching that defining moment when there just won't be enough physical material to go around at anything but rapidly escalating prices. Those escalating prices will encourage and drive others, including industrial consumers, to enter what should become a buying frenzy. Superimpose upon that the sudden destruction of a decades-old downward price manipulation and you have all the necessary ingredients for price event that will be referred to forever.

Thank you and I'd be happy to take any questions you might have.

If you don't trust GOLD,the only asset with a 6000 year track record, do you trust the logic of taking a $1,000 pine tree, cutting it up, turning it to pulp, putting some ink on it, and then calling it one billion $ dollars?

[verwijderd]
0
Roepen in de woestijn

Waar is in Nederland onze Ron Paul....aan de andere kant....hij blijft een roepende in de woestijn...helaas!

www.edelmetaalplaza.nl/web_redactie.a...

Monday Monday

Het begin van een nieuwe week...nieuwe maand, maar toch zien we meer van hetzelfde. De lente wil ook nog niet komen, en het herstel van de beurzen ook niet. Na de 218 break vorige week, en de redelijk close van vrijdag, had ik gehoopt op een revearsel. We zien echter de Indices verder wegzakken & alle markten staan extreem onder druk. Goud en Zilver kunnen ondanks dit geweld niet echt overtuigen, maar goed....dat konden we vorige week al een beetje zien. De edele metalen zakken erg snel weg, als de Indices ook maar iets stijgen. Op zich is een consolidatie niet verkeerd na een goede stijging, maar we hadden natuurlijk al dik boven de 1000 moeten staan. Goed, in the end zal het niets uitmaken.....

De politiek begrijpt totaal niet wat er allemaal aan de hand is, en er zit bovendien nog een groep die geen verandering wil (die denken dat ze echt goed doen & dat ze begrijpen wat er allemaal aan de hand is). Ik heb net weer gekeken naar een video van Ron Paul, en je kan 30 jaar roepen en doen....en geen echte antwoorden krijgen op je vragen, maar nobody cares ( Link ). Het is naar mijn mening een EXTREEM trieste conclusie, dat iedereen weet dat het fout is...maar niemand iets doet...en gewoon verder gaat met hetgeen wat men doet. Hoe is het toch mogelijk, dat dit soort mensen totaal geen aandacht krijgen....en politiek gezien niets, maar dan ook niets van de grond krijgen. Het is geen toeval naar mijn mening...maar wel in en in triest. De vraag blijft natuurlijk, hoe lang je mensen dom kan houden, zonder dat het uit de hand loopt. Daarom ben ik zelf ook bang, dat er geen ' positieve' verandering komt...maar alleen maar een hoop narigheid.....een oorlog, haat, sociale onrust...ziektes....aanslagen.

Ik ga hier dieper op in, omdat dit probleem de basis is voor alle rotzooi die we nu zien. We moeten terug naar een eerlijk geld systeem, met een dekking...en niet proberen welvaart te creëren uit de drukpers, simpelweg omdat dat niet mogelijk is. Het Ron Paul verhaal laat zien hoe moeilijk het is, mensen daarvan te overtuigen, ondanks dat je gelijk hebt....men wil er gewoon niet aan. De Politiek, Centrale Banken en de Banken....zullen hun positie verdedigen tot de laatste snik....en helaas zal dat betekenen dat de economie eerst compleet kapot moet gaan, voordat men kijkt naar een echte oplossing. Zoals altijd...regeren is vooruit zien, maar de huidige politici en beleidsmakers kijken achteruit....voorspellen achteruit & nemen de kiezer niet serieus...en trekken hun eigen plan. Is dat zo raar dat de PVV op dit moment de grootste partij is? Nee, natuurlijk niet...steeds meer mensen pikken het niet, alleen weten veel mensen niet waarom het fout gaat op dit moment. Zoals Ron Paul al eerder aangaf....bijna niemand begrijpt deze crisis.

Ik moet eerlijk zeggen...hoe moeilijk is het?
- bank heeft 100 euro spaargeld
- leent op die 100 euro aan 7-8 personen 100 uit
- er gaat 1 iemand van de 7-8 failliet, en de bank is failliet...

Buiten dat...de prijsstelling is compleet op zijn kop voor een aantal markten, want men geeft de 700 euro wel uit aan aandelen, kleding, auto's , huizen, wat weer bubbels veroorzaakt. Deze crisis is dus niet moeilijk...men maakt het vooral erg moeilijk. Simpele dingen worden dusdanig moeilijk gemaakt, dat niemand meer begrijpt hoe of wat. Economische data wordt is supercomputers gegooid & net zo lang ' verkracht', totdat het goede antwoord eruit komt. Achteraf passen ze alles aan....maar wie kijkt er dan nog naar? Iedereen loopt weg van zijn verantwoordelijkheid, want het is altijd iemand anders. Verder zitten we natuurlijk nog met het feit, dat we achter de VS aanlopen....dat hebben we altijd gedaan, en dat zullen we altijd blijven doen. Nixon maakte een einde aan Bretton Woods, omdat speculanten de Dollar onder druk zette.....Nixon? Ja, van Watergate...zeer betrouwbaar dus, en bovendien een leugenaar als het gaat om speculanten. Zoals hier al vaak aangegeven, geld drukkken voor je oorlog onder een Goudstandaard (of dollar goud standaard), kan niet.....maar geef de speculanten maar de schuld (het is altijd iemand anders). Amerika doet...en de rest van de wereld moet/gaat mee. Tijdens de bimetaal standaard was het niet anders...de VS ging van Goud Zilver standaard, naar Goud standaard...en de rest van de wereld ging mee....of moest mee. Ook op het gebied van oorlog was het de laatste tijd natuurlijk zo....de VS moest naar Irak, ondanks de VN. De VS trekt zich niets van de rest van de wereld aan...nooit gedaan, en zal dat ook nooit doen. Op zich is dat niet erg, aangezien een land als Nederland natuurlijk zelf kan bepalen wat men wel en niet wil....nou, op het monetair vlak is dat niet helemaal het geval, of zoals James Sinclair zegt:
"the establishment of a gold-based currency is rebellion against the IMF, as it is distinctly forbidden under IMF rules."

We kunnen in Nederland dus niet over op Goud, want dat mag niet, omdat het IMF het niet wil. Er zijn dus mensen die terug willen naar een eerlijk monetair systeem, maar het IMF zegt nee....Ik begrijp er minder en minder van....wie/wat is het IMF? Het doet mij denken aan Greenspan, met zijn toezicht op de derivaten (was niet nodig....achteraf foutje). Hoe is het mogelijk, dat een kleine groep mensen/instituten op dit moment bepaald wat ' goed' is voor de burger (terwijl alles instort)? Wie moet zijn portemonnee opentrekken, om deze poppenkast draaiende te houden? Wie neemt deze groep nog serieus, en waarom is niemand verantwoordelijk? Het aardige is ook, mensen willen wel de vinger wijzen...of kunnen wijzen, en logisch ook. Politici, banken, Centrale Banken, Pensioen Fondsen etc....' spelen' niet met hun eigen geld...het ontwijken van de schuldvraag door de gevestigde orde is bijna lachwekkend te noemen. De enige bescherming tegen het roof gedrag & complete mismanagement is Goud. Dat blijft het mooie van de huidige maatschappij, dat je zelf die keuze kan maken....want de overheid zal dat niet voor je doen. Ron Paul laat zien, dat je jezelf moet beschermen, en de hersende elite op het monetaire vlak doorgaat tot het einde. De drukpers staat aan....en heeft de afgelopen tijd al tussen de 7 en de 9 biljoen Dollar aan onzin gedekt. Ik zou ZO graag een ander geluid willen horen in onze politiek....maar niet alleen horen, ook zien uitoefenen. Met diepe respect kijk ik en luister ik naar Ron Paul....maar het blijft een roepende in de woestijn...hoe is dat anno 2009 toch mogelijk?????

www.edelmetaalplaza.nl/web_redactie.a...

If you don't trust GOLD,the only asset with a 6000 year track record, do you trust the logic of taking a $1,000 pine tree, cutting it up, turning it to pulp, putting some ink on it, and then calling it one billion $ dollars?

[verwijderd]
0
Voor degenen met fysiek goud en zilver wil ik wellicht nogmaals ten overvloede opmerken hoe belangrijk het nu geworden is om het vermogen letterlijk en figuurlijk met alle denkbare middelen te beschermen en te verdedigen. We staan aan nog maar pas aan het begin van wat inmiddels al de ergste crisis sinds de 14 e eeuw wordt genoemd. De wereldwijde vernietiging van de westerse middenklasses begint heel langzaam maar zekker een beetje op stoom te komen en bereidt je zorgvuldig voor na fysiek goud en zilver en effectieve beschermingsmaatregels op de volgende fase voor.

Succes

GH

Hier in ieder geval nog een uiterst informatieve webcast over het fabriceren van Zilveren munten.

How its made: Zilveren munten
Intro:

Het programma van de Discovery Channel "how its made" heeft het deze keer over Zilver munten

edelmetaalplaza.com/web_redactie.asp?...

If you don't trust GOLD,the only asset with a 6000 year track record, do you trust the logic of taking a $1,000 pine tree, cutting it up, turning it to pulp, putting some ink on it, and then calling it one billion $ dollars?

smith&jones
0
Goud (fysiek!!) is een belegging die ik iig mijn vader heb aangeraden.

Ikzelf trade op juniors, adrenaline genoeg!!

S&J.
[verwijderd]
0

..........Gung Ho schreef:....."Waar is in Nederland onze Ron Paul ?"..........

Howdy,

Dat ben JIJ toch?

>--:-)-->
[verwijderd]
0
Minister Bos: "Het is de schuld van de beleggers"...nou moe?!@#
Intro:

What goes up (a bit), must go down alot. De frustratie bij de Dollar Goud beleggers moet immens zijn, aangezien het rendement daar minimaal is. Goed, we weten het...de zomer/lente is een slappe periode, en de maand maart wil nog wel eens een belangrijke top of bodem neerzetten.

Volledige analyse:

Niet alleen de Aex op zoek naar steun

Het is niet alleen kommer en kwel voor de Indices, want ook Goud zakt iedere dag verder en verder weg. Daar waar het de afgelopen maanden tegen de markt in bewoog, daar zakt het nu in rap tempo met de markt mee naar beneden. Het is een patroon dat we trouwens altijd zien, want een positief sentiment gaat altijd gepaard met een enorm bloedbad...en ook nu is dat weer het geval. Daarom dat ik al eerder mijn trading posities eruit heb gegooid, omdat het altijd hetzelfde principe is....what goes up (a bit), must go down alot. De frustratie bij de Dollar Goud beleggers moet immens zijn, aangezien het rendement daar minimaal is. Goed, we weten het...de zomer/lente is een slappe periode, en de maand maart wil nog wel eens een belangrijke top of bodem neerzetten.

Ik heb gisteren nog even contact gehad met Ron Schouten van de HBU, over de huidige Goudmarkt. Er valt eerlijk gezegd niet veel spannends te melden, behalve dat de daling van het Goud ' opmerkelijk' is. Ik maak me trouwens ook zorgen voor de prijs in Euro's, aangezien de Dollar zo enorm sterk is, dat een herstel van de Indices de Dollar weer onder druk kan zetten (net als het Goud). Een combi zwakke Dollar met zwakke metals kan de Euro prijs flink laten dalen. Logisch is allemaal niet natuurlijk, maar goed...daar gaat het niet om met Goud. De logica is er nooit geweest, en daarom zitten we met de andere markten in de problemen. Sound money komt altijd bovendrijven, alleen is het de vraag hoelang ze deze poppenkast kunnen volhouden. Ik kijk zelf minder en minder naar rendement m.b.t. Goud, en zie de lage prijs meer als een koopmoment voor de langere termijn....

Het gaat de aankomende jaren een puinhoop worden, en Goud zal overleven....no worries. Speculeren met Goud blijft extreem lastig....vermogens worden verkregen, maar ook verloren. Goud is en blijft een hele enge markt voor de speculanten, dat hebben we vorig jaar (weer )kunnen zien....maar ook nu weer, toch? Zo sta je op de 1000, en in iets meer dan 1 week tijd dik 10% lager. Als iemand me kan vertellen waarom....dan hoor ik het graag. Een correctie na de goede stijging is natuurlijk een slap excuus...het 1000 Level als flinke weerstand ook...vraag uitval India...zou nog kunnen....ETF in/uitstroom? Goed, who cares...ik zie jaar in jaar uit hetzelfde patroon, er komt een nieuwe groep speculanten in de markt, en deze groep wordt compleet gekilled in de correctie erna. Goud blijft niet liggen na een stijging....en stijgt al helemaal niet door, zoals we dat met nagenoeg alle andere commodities hebben gezien. Neen, Goud kan crashen....net als Zilver...uit het niets, en het is deze onzichtbare hand, die we ook de afgelopen week zien. Enorme sellers uit het niets, rammen het Goud in recordtempo naar beneden.

In the end maakt het allemaal niets uit...Goud is al die jaren ook omhoog gegaan, al is de extreme stijging tot nu toe uitgebleven. Belangrijker is dat de geschiedenis laat zien, dat het nooit is gelukt Goud onder controle te houden. Dat heeft simpelweg te maken met het feit dat het schaars is....in tegenstelling tot geld.

Er is natuurlijk heel veel te melden op het nieuwsfront, zoveel zelfs, dat ik door de bomen het bos niet zie. Voormalig minister Zalm wil betrouwbare aandeelhouders & minister Bos wil bedrijven/aandeelhouders kunnen nationaliseren. Hoe deze 2 samen kunnen in de huidige markt...you tell me. Verder weten we nu waarom het allemaal is fout gegaan, het is ONZE schuld....van de aandeelhouders . Minister Bos & de poppenkast er omheen, weet prima wie schuldig is....alles en iedereen, behalve de politiek en de toezichthouders. De arrogantie van de beleidsmakers begint dusdanige niveaus aan te nemen, dat ik bijna uit mijn vel spring. Waarom is dat belangrijk? De schuldvraag is een belangrijk iets, juist omdat zogenaamd niemand schuldig is....of misschien beter gezegd, alles en iedereen is schuldig, en het is te onduidelijk wie/wat er precies aan de hand is. De onduidelijkheid, vaagheid, ingewikkeldheid....draaien....manipuleren, is echt iets van deze tijd. Men maakt het zo moeilijk/onduidelijk, dat het voor niemand te begrijpen is wie er verantwoordelijk is. Dit principe hoort bij het fiat systeem, want we zien het overal. Juridisch, economisch, statistisch....maakt het mogelijk dat niemand de balans kan lezen, de cijfers kan interpreteren...en problemen kan signaleren. Daarom dat niemand heeft zien aankomen dat de Nederlandse banksector in paar maand failliet is gegaan....derivaten...balansen, niemand begrijpt er wat van, en dat is precies de bedoeling. Daarom heeft meer toezicht ook geen zin, omdat de basis rot is.

Met een rotte basis gaan we de crisis bestrijden, en de eerste maatregelen moet ik nog horen. Niemand heeft oplossingen...behalve oplossingen die al in de planning zaten of meer van hetzelfde. Zolang de basis van ons monetaire systeem rot is, zal het nooit wat worden & lijkt een zombie scenario a la Japan het hoogst haalbare. De rente naar beneden brengen, om nog meer slechte leningen toe te voegen aan de puinhoop die we nu hebben, is echt geen oplossing. Centrale Bankiers, politici en de commerciele banken hebben de economie (zoals die na de oorlog is opgebouwd onder een eerlijk monetaire systeem) compleet uitgehold. Nu het geld niets meer waard is ( en vertrouwen het enige is dat dit kaartenhuis overeind houdt), zien we de vraag ineens instorten overal. Een belangrijke vraag is dus ook, was de vraag van de afgelopen jaren echte vraag...of vraag als gevolg van de kunstmatige lage rente/asset bubbels.....of vraag op basis van credit...vraag op basis van speculatie?

Geld is niet schaars....dat was het niet, en zal zolang we onder een fiat systeem leven, zal het ook niet schaars worden. Geld is als gevolg daarvan niets waard, behalve het vertrouwen dat mensen/burgers erin hebben. Vertrouwen is een raar ding....een eng ding, en daarom dat slimme mensen al 5000 jaar Goud gebruiken als valuta. Er is dan per definitie vertrouwen in je valuta, omdat Goud schaars is & een intrinsieke waarde heeft....in tegenstelling tot fiat geld. Vertrouwen in de Euro...de Dollar of de Yen....wat is de waarde hiervan, wat geeft deze valuta zijn waarde? Deze valuta hebben geen intrinsieke waarde, en net als het vertrouwen in de economie, kan het vertrouwen in de valuta compleet wegvallen.(in record tempo). Sterker nog, in de monetaire geschiedenis is geen 1 voorbeeld te vinden wanneer dat niet gebeurt is met een fiat valuta.

De drukpers draait nu al 38 jaar op volle toeren, en geld is minder en minder waard aan het worden. Sparen voor je oude dag, pensioenregeling via de beurs, aflossen van je hypotheek....de basis voor het opbouwen van vermogen is compleet weggevallen. Mijn generatie (35 - 40 jaar) ....maar ook 1 daarboven...en alles daaronder, bouwen niets op...behalve schulden. Het is te hopen dat de babyboom generatie genoeg geld achterlaat, want sparen en/of aflossen van je hypotheek is niet meer van deze tijd. Als mijn generatie straks met pensioen gaat, dan staat die lening op het huis er nog steeds...is het spaarge
[verwijderd]
1
De drukpers draait nu al 38 jaar op volle toeren, en geld is minder en minder waard aan het worden. Sparen voor je oude dag, pensioenregeling via de beurs, aflossen van je hypotheek....de basis voor het opbouwen van vermogen is compleet weggevallen. Mijn generatie (35 - 40 jaar) ....maar ook 1 daarboven...en alles daaronder, bouwen niets op...behalve schulden. Het is te hopen dat de babyboom generatie genoeg geld achterlaat, want sparen en/of aflossen van je hypotheek is niet meer van deze tijd. Als mijn generatie straks met pensioen gaat, dan staat die lening op het huis er nog steeds...is het spaargeld via de inflatie bijna niets meer waard. De politici zijn verantwoordelijk voor de keuze van het huidige monetaire system....en de Centrale Banken zijn maar wat blij hun vijand (Goud), dag in dag uit schade toe te richten, door de opgebouwde Goudpositie van de Nederlandse burgers te verkopen & in te ruilen voor papieren rommel.

Beleggers weten het al jaren, geld uitgeven van iemand anders is het makkelijkst wat er is & met verbazing kijk ik dag in dag hoe de politici, centrale bankier en commerciële bankiers het geld uitgeeft....verprutst & lachend wegloopt voor de gemaakte fouten. Het is te bizar voor woorden, dat de mensen die moeten letten op het geld van de burger...precies het tegenovergestelde doen. Aan de andere kant, de burger heeft er zelf voor gekozen....als is dat voor het fiat systeem niet het geval. Het fiat systeem is de burger opgedrongen door president Nixon...die oplichter, boef....leugenaar. Hoe is het toch mogelijk, dat 1 iemand zoiets beslist? Dat principe....net als met het toezicht op derivaten door Greenspan, is iets wat nooit zal veranderen......
Got Gold?

stay safe
mihaly

edelmetaalplaza.com/web_redactie.asp?...

If you don't trust GOLD,the only asset with a 6000 year track record, do you trust the logic of taking a $1,000 pine tree, cutting it up, turning it to pulp, putting some ink on it, and then calling it one billion $ dollars?

pg weinheber
1
quote:

Gung Ho schreef:

We moeten terug naar een eerlijk geld systeem, met een dekking...

Hoe zie je dat?

Stel je heb 100kg goud op 5 miljard mensen.
En de bevolking groeit van 5 naar 6 miljard.

Wordt iedereen dan armer, omdat je het over meer mensen moet verdelen?
459 Posts, Pagina: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 19 20 21 22 23 » | Laatste
Aantal posts per pagina:  20 50 100 | Omhoog ↑

Meedoen aan de discussie?

Word nu gratis lid of log in met uw e-mailadres en wachtwoord.

Direct naar Forum

Markt vandaag

 AEX
928,12  +4,02  +0,44%  10:05
 Germany40^ 21.833,60 +0,21%
 BEL 20 4.336,49 -0,03%
 Europe50^ 5.340,85 +0,29%
 US30^ 44.423,80 +0,18%
 Nasd100^ 21.612,60 +0,48%
 US500^ 6.049,46 +0,32%
 Japan225^ 38.876,70 +1,23%
 Gold spot 2.898,07 +1,30%
 EUR/USD 1,0329 +0,36%
 WTI 71,46 +0,72%
#/^ Index indications calculated real time, zie disclaimer

Stijgers

NX FILTRATION +6,62%
Sif Holding +2,67%
CM.COM +2,31%
PROSUS +1,94%
BAM +1,92%

Dalers

Basic-Fit -3,09%
ArcelorMittal -2,34%
AMG Critical ... -1,93%
Aperam -1,65%
PostNL -1,16%

EU stocks, real time, by Cboe Europe Ltd.; Other, Euronext & US stocks by NYSE & Cboe BZX Exchange, 15 min. delayed
#/^ Index indications calculated real time, zie disclaimer, streaming powered by: Infront